From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Visher Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is there a setting that makes emacs begin editing the init.el file on startup? Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 08:50:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515160170 5038 195.159.176.226 (5 Jan 2018 13:49:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 13:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs To: Jonathon McKitrick Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 05 14:49:21 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXSN6-0000l5-V2 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 14:49:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41113 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXSP6-0003TD-7e for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 08:51:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXSOY-0003ST-Cn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 08:50:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXSOX-0000PZ-No for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 08:50:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]:44561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXSOX-0000Oy-ID for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 08:50:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id p144so3493047vke.11 for ; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 05:50:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xmDMBBRhJ0JA0vXI0EUBJzstOzpRzpzvhXnH8VTBkb4=; b=LKcFgUoUqMgtfAR0ACJbKBpCTYCIBpUMlZRRa+yf1KQbV9hLbVcPOoj3orpp7yhd35 A+5oy670wU3vOId5oUQpCfTNWr4C4cc7BtuVaQQ6rrNKdmN30atUiYXLEvOiMWbuj6H7 K7tCTZfx8jg6SNQknEols2kJ6Rf5RN62U1Lh+kCN9e+7mA4n1kRoSWBkGay+RBUk+c6v DY0ytx27+VIUqgTk896B6ZFr1Yv60/plsP7KBAXXk7LbpuafgKbRFmUfMLwoffMC7FEs s+ESJ4f8GCcgojUWo5eT8AN/Uk8NKk7vkEB3o48n3MTcv7KqkMqmN5asnYmkLtkboVAt jVCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xmDMBBRhJ0JA0vXI0EUBJzstOzpRzpzvhXnH8VTBkb4=; b=OsVNXM8VWRJgwx/UOB9gRuUHLyfk2im3fxYxH5g2L4AG00fD+sB8mwUwI32ldAK1UW Jp/6klP+t70ZRTBis8y03wAIi9/GW4ME2Kn6+l5FP5cHs4BFs6bN191rzYULbAS95ZZJ 1Pky7RsbEOF0s6rJVcqy/5lbyfz/5cpA2wnx/yUbxb2I4ThX/v+KEHkUOMXohkOYgPte nu5nVzKg9Ugp8HjelUtNI/8PxBz3+KNbPXeA//3X4xuMPvurXcyzlXrzOEHgaCoVJdqD 25iDzwYNqrY5BvIYs/Q8gexCe//EugW4o/r7/6tjQRHfQo0EcgerFUsdmIYd5ExUuMnx 9i/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytey5t81S82L0D4p81nbME5YvpmqvF92MK2VGfeP/yzHjMk7642+ KQDu6R1scKn/pcE1hFDEjl2lisrQgjFN2HHMHcU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou6OEbqMAnqqNSr03VHTJvEOjWiGKyTOyxuuUGs2MjQ4Gol8TohC3zIa/uNpXzwhzf7UpQNqQtfQLR3ebVfW4s= X-Received: by 10.31.139.71 with SMTP id n68mr2836877vkd.118.1515160247521; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 05:50:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.176.94.130 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 05:50:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:115593 Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:46 AM, wrote: > It was my mistake. I have a function that edits the init file, and somehow > one of the sexps escaped and was being evaluated directly on startup. Thus, > the file appearing. > > Sounds about right. :)