From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Charlie Andrews Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: profiler-report seems to be missing data? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:33:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83600aiec6.fsf@gnu.org> <87600ae38v.fsf@web.de> <831sayi5k6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1534442315 1278 195.159.176.226 (16 Aug 2018 17:58:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 16 19:58:31 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fqMXT-0000Bw-Tt for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 19:58:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57533 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqMZa-0004XY-Cj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:00:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqM9R-0001Py-7Z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqM9Q-00088c-Gn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]:38037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqM9N-00087x-Fw; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:33:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id v71-v6so7762295itb.3; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:33:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J2zhyEnIpexfS/meCXi6jiNNdG/qZ2EUeP5q4yIJigU=; b=Fp5+5RlCOvvx8D2F2eF6nlFSThYWouYXKVcDYy8wW9Ppn7yFkslNvjMTZroqizvOnW LqPeYsgxpex5WeQYzr+1wkwzxnFByohmTASgt2R1y0IzUxeZp9m46H8OXzzc/6+PEwux 7sVEJgEu8nfW3HEuUqY50BlTuJGJacsg5WzRO9xLLQX8jGfSJejn+roXxeYoa+3YkjYy shSjMSzoIG8qRDYD5dRXDFP7W4y8uC0jzZmeFOQv0qK1hK6QCKHbVs7PrJ1aU/utEoZD hOtgHn5RrI90sWWTrNEN2Z7YdSlgjDAQJownaWPR+HLWlXYjVdTveXrBaNsWXAmjajws Xglw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J2zhyEnIpexfS/meCXi6jiNNdG/qZ2EUeP5q4yIJigU=; b=EZCNeUZmtjZ999fRncgxSYWDdvgqLRquJ8RLPwxqn8vDpYtJgs2qR3EYE++F3OfcUS z5unt32Vq1yXnYxWMX5BTu2Th9N+dKxGEr/OqA9832Fsnq9JRGMg/5f2xQuvjpiaC4C7 IqM4cqbV43vah9nO6iaF8jRGpP35G+DgSDf2DOSfwvCSHxi/6pAk+QtqlxKOuLkygnU6 iWiwNGuNWebxisa32tClLEGavgiOgop+Sxe50Iw673m2Ry+M6Tq0QcGxhHSvLc0CsgGx VhatOQogFat0E0miBZ5qaTL1DUOAO7WUTKnLHGs6ZmJiospLPOQUAisJjtLXdcwNjnFj aJLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEDRPVBOwu+Bea1HKVlQMolAqhmRk58ok220A0QcPb7cDJ833DC hEzNdJrEUwwaE2MF3KMaJEb7M/yUBxmtmfpzfTBBIQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPzUiRWEk+0ao7mIDoz1+U0iOdpLD5JEOlTzffJEPvq9/Z2EO6yCCGEOi2xXaAinhmLY7MC8CL6AJOkaKkHiWdI= X-Received: by 2002:a24:5f92:: with SMTP id r140-v6mr23201093itb.95.1534440810777; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:33:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <831sayi5k6.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:59:13 -0400 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:117674 Archived-At: Sorry for the silly question: unless I'm changing some emacs-wide variable that might logically force some recomputation in those buffers (like changing the gutter after which characters on a given line are highlighted red, for example) or Emacs is under memory pressure, why would the number of buffers affect the time required for let to run? On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 1:30 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Charlie Andrews > > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:12:23 -0400 > > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > > > Any tips on making these let bindings faster? I've read online that > enabling lexical binding for the plugin might > > help. > > If you have a lot of dead buffers, this should be much faster in the > next release. > > If the problem is that you have a lot of live buffers, maybe you > should install some feature that deletes those of them that haven't > been used for a while, from time to time. > >