From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18752: 24.3.94; Why is Cygwin Emacs 2x quicker than Windows Emacs? Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:11:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86h9z2rb42.fsf@example.com> <83siim1z6h.fsf@gnu.org> <86iojimmjg.fsf@example.com> <83wq7ydjc7.fsf@gnu.org> <86zjctlvkv.fsf@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413648748 28195 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2014 16:12:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 16:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18752@debbugs.gnu.org To: Fabrice Niessen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 18 18:12:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XfWc6-0000VL-Qy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:12:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37169 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfWc6-0006Jt-21 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:12:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfWbw-0006JV-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:12:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfWbq-0000YW-Qs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:12:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57043) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfWbq-0000YS-NY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfWbq-0000VD-9N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 16:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18752 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18752-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18752.14136487171921 (code B ref 18752); Sat, 18 Oct 2014 16:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2014 16:11:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfWbl-0000Uu-0b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:33338) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XfWbi-0000Ul-GG for 18752@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id h11so6112661wiw.0 for <18752@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Zk7hg2GIxWhcGq0L/0dNkfKiny1UIotrEte+k7L3S94=; b=zSW35qulDwfxzDvsY+QMFlL3V4VwTwL4J6evDvD88ISqoLaYhVv4BhGX+8oeKMWKS9 fjG3tydOSl6s0xoZoD4HjQJQ8mBO9VgtzC1mB2ZxmBFo+b89pE49J38twNGTHD/AHD+Q q1NmGB0QhGHyq0fSvb2izY8FMc2jIclu8xz8yPyd7KlutO46wx0PXj2E/qqZSdfT6BPc IOd561YO9DkSaNP884140JZgekxhHN/RLJ7OBs5uw+YaLOk/AIafKX8gkNi/rfbJWbsM ksui60WAOfbnQjAOJB/nlSbudqGskGWiX6Sq1wT/KeqqsAAvUpdNO/os+vwbUspg7Mi6 4rCA== X-Received: by 10.180.80.39 with SMTP id o7mr7014207wix.82.1413648713559; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.217.56.3 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86zjctlvkv.fsf@example.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94735 > Dani, can you build an optimized version as well next time? I could, yes. But before, I'd like to understand what are the advantages and drawbacks of optimized vs unoptimized builds. Could someone explain that to me, or tell me where could I read that information? Also, what should I do to produce an optimized build? "nt/INSTALL" shows an example of how to configure an unoptimized build, but there is no example for an optimized one. How about adding that lacking example to the file? -- Dani Moncayo