From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12078: 24.1; Improve the I-search prompt Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:30:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87txwr2ylo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87d33esat8.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87mx25g64k.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344414665 21427 80.91.229.3 (8 Aug 2012 08:31:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 08:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12078@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 08 10:31:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1fU-0002UK-UM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:31:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43818 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1fT-0000lJ-MN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1fQ-0000fh-N4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1fP-0005T8-AD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:31:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1fP-0005T4-4y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:30:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1nB-0006kw-Jo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:39:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 08:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12078-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12078.134441513225955 (code B ref 12078); Wed, 08 Aug 2012 08:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12078) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2012 08:38:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41052 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1n0-0006kZ-S0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:38:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:39300) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sz1mw-0006kP-Tf for 12078@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:38:47 -0400 Original-Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so845027obb.3 for <12078@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 01:30:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Drp3U/SXia2V6i0AwyvZLecbv3Gu9XKe+rYj9TZnDsw=; b=i5NjB6FpPQfyE8Abdf7HYa3FCMk5amjNuEhXxCxH3t0mA+4RmW2D+7oX72Lh9GEH94 sI8WfxJS7HQs9NZNRoYsjAW8LwKesu9ymFl2yTEKjSPeG+6NlLK6oEl6DgfsyMbNyZ3x 3Qho0bsLtVwGEjh4sDW8dNyignnrGnrwLrjaHE3JFosD6xtRSIXQsnpnKNr1tcFClryi /qOPelYQ7JyWF2uy0rvsbjJHjsjQophk3fWxslQVv9tWci+lny+Ha/dch74n9pEJ0TAY wl8axQHQI66Q1pO95qM3sOsC66H0YyaXNAw2jBvEVMwLe0HSQ/KXE0XmmwvFD10pSUDQ mrqw== Original-Received: by 10.60.21.198 with SMTP id x6mr28649070oee.24.1344414643110; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 01:30:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.60.79.226 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 01:30:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mx25g64k.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62939 Archived-At: >> However, on second thought, I think that the "failing" message is >> actually unnecessary. Looking at the echo area, it is obvious whether >> the current search is failing or not (if it's failing, the unmatched >> text will be on a different face). > > After trying this I think the "[failing]" message doesn't look too nice. > As you mentioned, it is unnecessary due to the `isearch-fail' face. > But then this message still should be displayed in environments that don't > support the `isearch-fail' face. Agreed. > The "[pending]" message should be changed too to address complaints > that it's unclear what does it mean. Maybe something like > "[Search type changed]" Currently I don't remember what is the meaning of this "pending" flag, but I trust you :) > The "[wrapped]" message could be displayed only once after wrapping, > like e.g. in Firefox that displays the message > "Reached top of page, continued from bottom" or > "Reached end of page, continued from top". Fine with me too. Thank you. -- Dani Moncayo