From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.windows,gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs gdb interface Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:26:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20120321075007.GF23207@discord.proulx.com> <20120321092843.GA9383@discord.proulx.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332325600 26594 80.91.229.3 (21 Mar 2012 10:26:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:26:40 +0000 (UTC) To: Bob Proulx , Dani Moncayo , help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-emacs-windows-bounces+gnu-help-emacs-windows=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 21 11:26:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gnu-help-emacs-windows@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAIkX-0004Yj-Uj for gnu-help-emacs-windows@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:26:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44288 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAIkX-0006zx-3g for gnu-help-emacs-windows@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAIkN-0006yi-G2 for help-emacs-windows@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:26:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAIkL-0002p8-SW for help-emacs-windows@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:26:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:39323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAIkL-0002ok-KP; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:26:25 -0400 Original-Received: by obbta14 with SMTP id ta14so737930obb.0 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:26:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W1bmI5lolMmlFZdpH+uky7kHTY5g+AJ3ZSn99hh2X0M=; b=vw2ea7KXX8TNKGRQ/NwyyyBmtu3EQUSJ2aRILQs/2PRy936aZU6Y1dESQ0ImpB65zK G/7wzONQmvx/CGgcn4qrLa/qFdEHbKM4O0qZFxw7VlwaQh/2IbA93ZLrfeoih2V8xpQp FIVluk66bWz9fxfBClrbHTDNmpL1xl6bz24NnkN13ey1JQE1oUQO+YQW2Farw3ps9IWO IfFubnsGysInnD9BpWijuOZe3S40tIwUWnyfLjTSx64N7xhcimkAyDnX8pyWuNrv3WYj T0fapETQ7WyzptlGBnrdb0lDScIW0pFxNf+byTK/UbWQDOhtQLPRn4w84GT5/F9E+gNi VpbQ== Original-Received: by 10.182.119.101 with SMTP id kt5mr3722677obb.70.1332325583082; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.60.42.193 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:26:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120321092843.GA9383@discord.proulx.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.214.169 X-BeenThere: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion forum for users of the GNU Emacs port to Windows List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-emacs-windows-bounces+gnu-help-emacs-windows=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-emacs-windows-bounces+gnu-help-emacs-windows=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.windows:5316 gmane.emacs.help:84065 Archived-At: >> If that was the case, it would cause a lot of confusion to users, but >> fortunately, that's not the case (I've just tested it and I see no >> output either). > > It may be confusing but it is no different from having this case: > > =A0rwp@discord:~$ printf "Hello" ; printf "\r" > =A0rwp@discord:~$ > > Question: Where did the output go? =A0Answer: It was printed but then it > was covered by the prompt and effectively hidden. =A0Here I am using two > printf statements because your program didn't include one but in the > operation of gdm and emacs there is almost certainly one, which is > represented here by the second printf. Thanks for the explanation, but what I wanted to say is that the users expect that the "input/output" buffer in Emacs contains _exclusively_ the input/output text sent to/taken from the process, and in this case, the process does not write any "\r" character. In any case, as you said, this doesn't seem to be the origin of the problem= . Thanks. --=20 Dani Moncayo