From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10963: 24.0.94; `dabbrev-completion' and `completion-cycle-threshold' Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:41:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331559765 28346 80.91.229.3 (12 Mar 2012 13:42:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10963@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 12 14:42:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S75WL-0008Do-EN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:42:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35616 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S75WK-0006Np-N6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:42:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S75Vw-0006Jc-5m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S75Vr-0000zr-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:42:15 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S75Vr-0000zk-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:42:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S75yj-0008Ps-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10963 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10963-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10963.133156149832321 (code B ref 10963); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2012 14:11:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S75yM-0008PG-61 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:11:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]:46222) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S75yB-0008Oy-Ks for 10963@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:11:37 -0400 Original-Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so2478248ghb.3 for <10963@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:41:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QFvj4XOIu5GC+bXDaw+vt+Wx57VzvmsnbNjFqv6+w68=; b=ZgLlZwMYVryn/k9+FuON99sdSXyKxN0Nk1GvHttjP53X5mlakAz8Os/+hMXiLT1gb3 wKAYq0Wv4A1G3B9HrQA5KzHhCkcbl1OyvGRnJnc6E533NGXyQYZDszlkNIzIXQh0Ro/Z cUddZS1ZOoH3KlGuUnHqBcxqN+iAD6uN/CosZgDAxva+DYiN3TnX8YeAg8v5LnFUuJMG +zDrmMLwVCZHBT2egfPUFJaJZskk3GR+SjaiD1qAzv6T30otNpuFL5/D6tV55/u+uqqb +W68lPcGyTvcVK2hi8+DIC6RqPaEbuuFMeksLk3V5D2LRdD9vOmQacVPF1CUkDoIcJh1 hChA== Original-Received: by 10.182.192.36 with SMTP id hd4mr7518435obc.60.1331559696332; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.60.42.193 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:41:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57718 Archived-At: > I believe this is now fixed in the trunk, please confirm, Thanks, Stefan. It mostly works, but there is one detail that seems to need a fix: Consider this scenario: 1. M-: (setq completion-cycle-threshold 4) RET 2. foo1 RET foo2 RET foo3 RET foo Now, repeated `C-M-/' commands cycle like this: foo3/foo1/foo2 but repeated `M-/' commands cycle like this: foo3/foo2/foo1 I think that the cycling order should be equal in both cases, and IMO the right order is the one followed by `M-/' (ISTR that I've read something about this in the manual, but right now I can't find the place). -- Dani Moncayo