From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12801: 24.3.50; `scroll-conservatively' and `scroll-step' Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:33:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <837gq04sdr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352100843 21458 80.91.229.3 (5 Nov 2012 07:34:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12801@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 05 08:34:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHCF-00026E-9B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:34:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45363 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHC6-0000XL-Cf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHC3-0000XG-Kp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:34:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHC2-00060w-Cn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:33:59 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHC2-00060S-9D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:33:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHEz-0007M2-Iy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12801 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12801-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12801.135210098028217 (code B ref 12801); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12801) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2012 07:36:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49632 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHEI-0007L2-Ml for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:36:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:39455) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TVHEG-0007Kt-6k for 12801@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:36:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id v19so5084815obq.3 for <12801@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 23:33:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GEwUj9Fv6IN5WJ2eI1ZogPu+j2G65RndaZXfCYa+8Is=; b=S5X36rZh/HQM7+jf/HQ2hf4+GOB5+OeNgYmEqSYH7KLHOvWYlfwvJLIsGmXCmrDbW3 Oz5AnKBWSKkx2blsv7MIyBJdnVh7Mk5k7aHNQA7ZXaPQKEGV6U1CD9smJxcxu1O6jYMZ 63Y4pprwS8uhOi5szXqsYaTdg2Zd7YLmhrOZTxudGmHCI+Vo3m93kJlUiz+/0vH7SmNt H+yqNqAXrZWWHsu1egHUwYb7kKdvL1uTz5614ybE649b4U2FfyOTT1PtsvJVSol9fnm1 M6K2yx+t7U/jSHtyRLzPayovkiM445v43BmbRBbz5n6Mx7fD+DBzYvNfg/pxRNex6rrS QCXg== Original-Received: by 10.60.0.166 with SMTP id 6mr7052652oef.6.1352100791588; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 23:33:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.60.131.168 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:33:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <837gq04sdr.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66467 Archived-At: > If you set scroll-conservatively, scroll-step is ignored for the > purposes of deciding how much to scroll when point is off the window. > So the code works as intended. The documentation is not wrong, as it > describes scroll-conservatively before scroll-step, and the > description quite naturally should lead one to the above conclusion, > because these two variables contradict each other. Obviously I disagree. > I will make the > documentation more clear on this, though. Thank you. IMO that clarification is clearly needed. -- Dani Moncayo