Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org>:

> Paul Michael Reilly writes:
>
>  > Am I wrong, and it is intuitively obvious how we are going to deal
>  > with git and branches, rebasing, reviews, etc?
>
> Having observed several of these transitions, including Emacs's
> CVS->Bazaar transition, it's really not a problem as long as the git
> fans accept that several major contributors just want a CVS-like
> workflow, and git commands that implement that workflow are explained
> in straightforward terms.

Furthermore, the workflow documentation is already up on the wiki.
That's one of the first things I did.