From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Karl Otness Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25967: [PATCH] Add support for ImageMagick 7 (Bug#25967) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:21:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <6a48dc20-17fc-4e4b-b793-4c37c6bcbcc5@Spark> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1535512808 22954 195.159.176.226 (29 Aug 2018 03:20:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 03:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25967@debbugs.gnu.org To: rgm@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 29 05:20:03 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fur1W-0005rK-BU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 05:20:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40971 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fur3c-0007i8-MY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 23:22:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fur3V-0007hp-Pg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 23:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fur3S-00015z-Fe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 23:22:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59459) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fur3S-00015p-BP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 23:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fur3S-0002YR-5B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 23:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Karl Otness Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 03:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25967 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25967-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25967.15355128899780 (code B ref 25967); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 03:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25967) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2018 03:21:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36244 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fur2v-0002Xe-9j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 23:21:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com ([209.85.214.50]:40857) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fur2t-0002XR-B6 for 25967@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 23:21:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id h23-v6so5361208ita.5 for <25967@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:21:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=karlotness-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=S9fpmir3z+PdcdWBzyZaG4goXvn0PskXfLP+mvT1/lM=; b=Co2dcbrv7B/EcSSPe+pF8DCPWpQaqYsk26dsQpJOzFzJjbiSokKa54mhgub+X7qnLn BfZIz0MvQH+SntyStQgxfecT8QOk559JpBjBQMOs7FbigXT6f0vTMq06wftCXmnxIous yCm4zGo2nds9svAsbOPwVgunSm2XdoXaAroXkBba3fQrEZQtTXFdVxcWzVSbT3jgcpdE YMD0REjs3ZZGizdZz/8wP7W+I0x+OKkzYMAhjNeMpRPik7gL5oUmOoc/HklnnfnbrPv4 X/1urWktv3k/6qP01IHCCrVl0ZvLSw0f8v2QEz1sZw9ue+s7UCgxWGpWtYzr/WhMqXrZ /U6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S9fpmir3z+PdcdWBzyZaG4goXvn0PskXfLP+mvT1/lM=; b=gowxLZcERCJMS1iMFVF8bSurTK7MRgNF7bwFjjWJGWl0pWt7kM+zZmO4USYsUt+TKk quEBA94pDmhuL1cKygCBGuYucCKbrAE9qTdJx6OWrRwI72ydg2E77/q9b62BIhikrZvV 0il8OLfpZ1eOKIOeTP8xF7L5XHd6BHFH1OlkDiQkq1MMfvgkJLdeuiuJ5DnTknRGZLyb fypquYtVOA6LVZPu7i3xAGcs4mWA1zkubh3OeYq8IKZ2OSQR/ddeIriKUtYZkYkAcgGq qDS1Gb6c20OiDsIocmz2mSHwdmM0fyOnq9fZPn6/Mt5z0obcOb41SpzBwN4AjCL5qO4T gFzg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51B1s7cLiQTVBIEzqHqN+R0WDDB5caNBAWHtl2s4FTBzjyygLTvP dTH5Xo6SzZQLPdqnQ1pfEYNZph2juck= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdb+it+Ag97VhtB/1iPLZwWuGWr4g7uWubtXZEY8tXQ7mNBBXTqB2LtNnqJdT9hyPms8wcQwmw== X-Received: by 2002:a02:898d:: with SMTP id p13-v6mr3893752jaj.74.1535512881441; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com (mail-it0-f52.google.com. [209.85.214.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l26-v6sm1144097iok.34.2018.08.28.20.21.19 for <25967@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by mail-it0-f52.google.com with SMTP id d10-v6so5668529itj.5 for <25967@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:21:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a24:4ecb:: with SMTP id r194-v6mr3668921ita.39.1535512879670; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:21:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:149824 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:10 PM Glenn Morris wrote: > I applied it as 5729486, then tweaked it in bf1b147 (mainly to avoid > printing two identical "checking for imagemagick") I did a quick run of configure and I'm not sure if this is a difference in version of autoconf (mine reports version 2.69), but on my machine it seems to use the module definition when printing. I see: "checking for MagickWand >= 7... yes" I wonder if that might help the situation possibly using the same prefix for both pkg-config checks? Thanks, Karl