From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o?= Guerra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39649: 27.0.60; tab-line doesn't scroll Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:04:37 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87lfp0lsun.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87imk3a5sa.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h7zn4d99.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r1yoopgp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87d0a8bu5c.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2sup4c2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h7zg7vjx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pne2ilur.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871rqhj5x2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87lfonzmfr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87d09xqd17.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87d09rr841.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000aaecca05a016fdfd" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="41026"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 39649@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 05 09:05:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j9lVI-000AZB-Jm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:05:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44620 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j9lVH-0005ap-KD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 03:05:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j9lVA-0005af-5b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 03:05:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9lV8-000849-WC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 03:05:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9lV8-00083i-S3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 03:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j9lV8-0001bD-Kx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 03:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o?= Guerra Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 08:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39649 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39649-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39649.15833954966133 (code B ref 39649); Thu, 05 Mar 2020 08:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39649) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2020 08:04:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42130 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j9lV2-0001ar-6B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 03:04:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ua1-f45.google.com ([209.85.222.45]:42893) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j9lV0-0001ae-MR for 39649@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 03:04:55 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ua1-f45.google.com with SMTP id p2so1739296uao.9 for <39649@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:04:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U440IvV5YRABSMfDg1lTX7e30y8uWPlXuyvgtzp/Wuo=; b=IJV5bh5Lsp5U6gHwcg6iqpb5F+uyKiQQV+2Lc80DmgTibA8rFmCZWss2Juyc0NwplT wNuhe7S2G4N59NDeuuXlmnmxv6Uo0FV+Oiznr4r7u2+UADxUCQUj7mYovzIRJiNz4U1H S6bIInedyDwNG6yoNM2HuHH5wpRhVdvbP8hOW2uU9Vj3jxbwC5JtmDcFxQ8J0LSF9j0H oXbA+8oYV63leMk1F23F7sgXrLGE1DYG66On4AVwNm/JRi3kHouo0MUcf3CnDSuwW88C 9VkAYbzBTumG1/tBrN1xMQxOtiXIKsWg81WMbLnEWXG03ddbAzh3Sb+ahIZt2cu2/mFL MSjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U440IvV5YRABSMfDg1lTX7e30y8uWPlXuyvgtzp/Wuo=; b=mS8a4pmJzpFUKvT1ZarKdGr+O6489eVQJlewRn/j3LsL3LrM4D7gGk41yb9N+9vDJl U1833WPwcrUHMasnFZWJq5jWzeyUjIVSgEg/joyhrk3jvpvPaemrJFR7sEWb2gpaDYza e63dZYlVKKOkJ7zHgjvcRMhfC/pITdqX2W/tss77JwcpWXY8svKRdorAyLsVacXGSTp0 etQkANI0CUl9MjZnooucbCEC/+weaEcw9hegQItiUJAF3h+ddxaJeQr8s1jmqgNwYkcU s6izs7oVqCLFh97HddHG/4lo+EngFabCIGPEnQRXurD5NndKxjWUSgXjBGI7GJX35Udl uC4g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1nFvzG8/QI+JfoSg1xZyEJbWlfpyZ3/l5wDBO+3kiK5VCsiRsy CaGYMoMi63aNVkRFIwJroreD3Jx9RJKvt61QmKPZtw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsomBIbN+0f2BUXC96G1Q5OozNjSe8vJ93/V7ytFU/p0ceWAVHnRKItf1oj3StHjQKvYm4DT1kPLQwUF8d8c3Q= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2a82:: with SMTP id h2mr1761084uar.99.1583395489114; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:04:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d09rr841.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176886 Archived-At: --000000000000aaecca05a016fdfd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Ok, but how does that impact the characters sizes being different? On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, 01:22 Juri Linkov, wrote: > > I came across something that feels a bit odd in tab-line, maybe you > > can explain it. > > > > I've been playing around with tab-line-format and noticed that what > > gets displayed in the tab-line actually differs based on whether you > > are using the `tab-line' face or not. > > > > See the attached picture. Both Emacs were launched with -Q. Although > > the face definition is the same in both situations the result is > > different. Specially the rendered size of the characters. > > This is how mode-line/header-line/tab-line work - they always use > hard-coded faces with names 'mode-line', 'header-line', 'tab-line', > so you can override face definitions only by customizing these faces. > --000000000000aaecca05a016fdfd Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok, but how does that impact the characters sizes be= ing different?

On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, 01:22 Juri Linkov, <juri@linkov.net>= wrote:
> I came across somethin= g that feels a bit odd in tab-line, maybe you
> can explain it.
>
> I've been playing around with tab-line-format and noticed that wha= t
> gets displayed in the tab-line actually differs based on whether you > are using the `tab-line' face or not.
>
> See the attached picture. Both Emacs were launched with -Q. Although > the face definition is the same in both situations the result is
> different. Specially the rendered size of the characters.

This is how mode-line/header-line/tab-line work - they always use
hard-coded faces with names 'mode-line', 'header-line', = 9;tab-line',
so you can override face definitions only by customizing these faces.
--000000000000aaecca05a016fdfd--