>
> If you don't have 110767, then why is it interesting to report this

crash?  That revision was supposed to fix precisely this crash.
>

I didn't get the impression from our previous exchange that you had such a
high confidence in the connection (just that you were sure it was fixing a
bug, not that it was necessarily the bug I was tripping over).


> The current revision numbers on the emacs-24 branch and on the trunk
> are 110941 and 110993, respectively.  So why would you use such an old
> version, from more than 3 weeks ago?
>

This bug took hours/days to manifest; I wanted to see whether trunk already
had it fixed.  It seems that it was at least partially fixed since this
time it took a lot longer to manifest.

I'll sync & rebuild and will report back if I get another one of these.