>
> EZ> Maybe, maybe not. I don't understand why we need to grasp the first
> straw
> EZ> we see around to get rid of unexec. What's the rush?
>
> Eli has a good point here, there really is no rush. Daniel, would you be
> willing to continue to incubate these changes in a branch, while we also
> consider and explore alternatives?


Isn't unexec what prevents emacs from building inside docker containers
(because of the personality syscall)?

As far as I'm concerned, that's a quite annoying emacs limitation. See bug
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23529.

That said, I understand I'm probably a minory opinion, and that because
this is a sensitive topic we should not rush it... but it's not something
that should be put in a wish list (e.g some untested branch), because it's
something that needs to be fixed sooner or later.

Philippe