From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philippe Vaucher Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 26.2 RC1 is out! Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:14:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87o965nq4q.fsf@petton.fr> <87ftrgod5o.fsf@petton.fr> <87o964kl4p.fsf@petton.fr> <83a7hntn2c.fsf@gnu.org> <87lg17l1xi.fsf@petton.fr> <83k1grs283.fsf@gnu.org> <877ecrl06s.fsf@petton.fr> <83imwbs0ip.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f29bab0584ac2062" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="217766"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Glenn Morris , Nicolas Petton , andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 22 11:15:58 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h7HDR-000uTP-Ec for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:15:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55061 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7HDQ-0005JM-9H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7HCn-0005El-Ke for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7HCm-0006r9-I6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:15:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]:33246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7HCd-0006Pr-R6; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f23so1575861ljc.0; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 03:15:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Gnw9HQq5SF/hhkfOY6eXPRc2yw9Gbu/U4VuGFXlxA9c=; b=XKmmKICpBb9mI2B8UAFRH7V3vxAZiiwC8Xf0gSBGL00JMtKguGmJfm6gwb71gN+O/U O4MG3wKPvw99/dEvHL9vyn8JsgjPSeAlAzNfwPdXBGhewEtDgMLKbVPVAQJwq/Jn/Wcs ICTnkzQHIK+mZ1uvky1Yo1LrOhpzJS04TSJskTxCiepYdiNQ5r3/wVV8iNC3QZ2p96Fc 14eySB7s1qlmalpdAScpm0RAtPQWKAHydGv13RTl428tHd75EJatB5Pu7gj02mcWv7+3 gXlU04BYoboLVZ5hVAybUHb1WmfSN6AG6lOQ1h4MtUMK+D8G+IFCD0xiVUQVpdrp2kUJ m6Wg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Gnw9HQq5SF/hhkfOY6eXPRc2yw9Gbu/U4VuGFXlxA9c=; b=Z031KxG2uJtBTYJoK4T9giw2vPOqeXi2uSJSS+iTJ04ixNXhlvHGOnCO4HtU2vHIT3 +Rm1NxDicmWxA7sAR7XbM6aYS+JrbubaZWXrcuR1TTObiTd0j5EH0AsGULxBjf6ZLKm7 uTb3CVwqrFgmJCkUcXNj2lHWVFw2vepaRysE/7fOYrqJWgYJjJE1hdBKzGbTperieTWZ jrMw3B0Gkb1kI1fk9YdFCD2ZLtv2nzePGNo1HXQd+UY9tQIZ4ly79+eB8hwtppLuMMxC 9pKZi51Fs2cTb3kyZqwQM9dBILrdd4EkD94u+S85uZEDKNxk2NDRSwkVTlVxQF1eh4mw RARA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVZaFA/YRfaQM9ZMihYgkXep7in5KAoWXeVjqFfeWJKIuVwOckv qZ3P/ipLw3Ul5g9Nko4ArZZuwdg9xJ/rqDFkjbum3rsxxJI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqztc4D3Buavi4I1ldlX2suzlSVBB7XFM8hNb4KPaVAwSLyzHesld/KpF2IVhP5onpWjBYU7op1Hv5I7F/OGXK4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8719:: with SMTP id m25mr4951831lji.50.1553249705563; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 03:15:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83imwbs0ip.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234537 Archived-At: --000000000000f29bab0584ac2062 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > > > Which are the affected files? > > > > README > > configure.ac > > etc/HISTORY > > msdos/sed2v2.inp > > nt/README.W32 > > Ah, okay. So the problem is with having these say "26.2" whereas in > reality 26.2 might need more changes? If so, it doesn't sound a big > problem to me, but I'd like to hear Glenn's opinion as well. Just a thought: why not name it 26.2-rc1 in these 26.2-rc1 commits (with a 26.2-rc1 tag)? Then when the final 26.2 is out, rename it to 26.2 and thus when looking at these files you are always seeing the "latest released" version. Maybe that conflicts with other conventions tho, it's just an idea. Philippe --000000000000f29bab0584ac2062 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > Which are the affected files?
>
> README
> c= onfigure.ac
> etc/HISTORY
> msdos/sed2v2.inp
> nt/README.W32

Ah, okay.=C2=A0 So the problem is with having these say "26.2" wh= ereas in
reality 26.2 might need more changes?=C2=A0 If so, it doesn't sound a b= ig
problem to me, but I'd like to hear Glenn's opinion as well.

Just a thought: why not name it 26.2-rc1 in these= 26.2-rc1 commits (with a 26.2-rc1 tag)? Then when the final 26.2 is out, r= ename it to 26.2 and thus when looking at these files you are always seeing= the "latest released" version.

Maybe th= at conflicts with other conventions tho, it's just an idea.
<= br>
Philippe


--000000000000f29bab0584ac2062--