> All these problems are because of mismatch between your X layout and > your Emacs input method. Emacs doesn't know the X layout, so you need > to define it in Emacs by adapting an existing input method, > or defining different keys manually. Sorry, I don't understand. I also don't see anything about this in the documentation (README). I want physical key that is '/' in English to type '.' in Russian (because that is what it does in russian-computer), but invoke shortcuts bound to C-/, M-/ etc. Is that possible with `reverse-im'? Paul On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 10:43, Juri Linkov wrote: > >> When your X xkb layout has some differences from an Emacs input method, > >> you need to adjust these mismatched keys, but this is not a big problem. > > > > It doesn't. With switching Emacs input methods between English and > Russian > > I also get English '/' == Russian '.'. And so C-. in Russian input method > > works > > as C-/ in English, because it's the same physical key. > > > > Also, the same goes for many S-M-[digit] combinations, because characters > > on the digit row are often different in Russian layout. For example, > S-M-6 > > in > > English layout translates to M-^, `delete-indentation', but in Russian > > S-M-6 > > becomes M-:, `eval-expression'. And so on. > > All these problems are because of mismatch between your X layout and > your Emacs input method. Emacs doesn't know the X layout, so you need > to define it in Emacs by adapting an existing input method, > or defining different keys manually. > > > So, it is a good workaround that *mostly* works. But it doesn't solve the > > underlying issue. Which was successfully solved by other applications > tens > > of years ago. > > We already discussed this 10 years ago, and the conclusion was that > it would require too fundamental changes in how Emacs processes keystrokes. > > If now you have new ideas about how this would be possible to implement > by keeping backward-compatibility of the existing design, > patches that demonstrate the ideas are welcome. >