From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Pogonyshev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: expose XHASH [patch] Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 20:37:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <56FDA815.2090801@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460140699 18335 80.91.229.3 (8 Apr 2016 18:38:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 08 20:38:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aobIO-0002f6-LY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 20:38:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57702 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aobIN-0000x1-Vq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:38:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aobI8-0000s0-Fi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:38:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aobI7-00016S-LW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:38:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]:34089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aobI7-00016J-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:37:59 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-x230.google.com with SMTP id bg3so77697975obb.1 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 11:37:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=ukgV+G1Yq/2Y5RiOzNHzL2cA0E/MaPbUxMeciqXV3rA=; b=yr8ilUbimqEJ3hWklpg4xB99FdOt647FCFt7mZ29f0FDz90QjPgPhqYbfNZL7QnqIM 10OUMwvvH+fwZ90tzGDu2Mqho3hj4bdIkafUjBtih83tdGLNn//rSIkGl5fNDv3OHdM4 ccbzjPIVGXZVYHslaXG8o5vOIokuz23zsGt5VccGZjqNJeps9+ciRM/6HyH20MfSJK6J krsyX8H9NNeQKnJ0P6gjZ5N073oPT0kkNr0jADjh1zXBzxDfC/+WNG++nae50XvM2L5l VzAFBTmPk63osWzAcmeet9Dh/rytFzXtIJZRZfUV2QTEcvuYFXm7iJbvmm2hcTsH4pSY WPXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ukgV+G1Yq/2Y5RiOzNHzL2cA0E/MaPbUxMeciqXV3rA=; b=bydFFlcs5d3xMKuE1cRopdNsHJdwR/0FSq+87KPm8McQO706RKMauXw3LEXQ0VZKD3 29yVaKxc+VITDq2ik6woXYqThaVFmLSIa+rjuKZnO5Z+ccSAo2GlHqbi3+JJ9dWOpL6m pTeZ1NTqfUXcKeqMfe15LK/fD0C7huW8w3N849ZExpEfhg7TiKt2DJjCut3/6ABFXbm2 J0y9JjXUwbdrvak1s2HEwFxVNpKQKIflMwZmEj93xMak+V0y9UCCUo1bhEiNwvr+JSkt xDQF43U4mrA0vk8e9fjxpXNcCP7E54djLH4stKa/m6tTejH7Fuuw85OH+oB4IZ0hckwG pS4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJmCpExB0OZm1b8UAxnu6OFSHoZ+h5PSxkMODHXqpyaQzbr+cAv64t07jvcsgDDHy0HbTfNE4pT6gpHaA== X-Received: by 10.60.81.167 with SMTP id b7mr5212546oey.2.1460140679139; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 11:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.202.197.148 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:37:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202816 Archived-At: On 8 April 2016 at 20:10, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> * src/fns.c (Fsxhash_eq, Fsxhash_eql): New functions. > > It might make sense to rename sxhash to sxhash-equal for consistency. Well, I don't know, it's a functions that have existed for a good amount of time already. And also having some parallel in common lisp, for example. Or do you mean like renaming, but making `sxhash' an alias for `sxhash-equal'? Paul