From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Pogonyshev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23470: Feature request: preserve breakpoints when C-u C-M-x function definitions Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 19:21:09 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462555422 16086 80.91.229.3 (6 May 2016 17:23:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 17:23:42 +0000 (UTC) To: 23470@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 06 19:23:32 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjTO-0004SA-VU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 19:23:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59436 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjTL-0002NP-72 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjTC-00029r-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:23:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjT0-0005qE-LK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:23:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57895) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjSz-0005pK-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjSw-0007kB-1n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Paul Pogonyshev Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 17:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 23470 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.146255533129697 (code B ref -1); Fri, 06 May 2016 17:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2016 17:22:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41999 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjS7-0007iv-4v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:22:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjS5-0007ii-4G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjRq-0005Xk-Nl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:22:00 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjRp-0005Va-ID for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:21:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53369) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjRd-0000Pi-SZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:21:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjRQ-0005Rh-6w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:21:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]:33610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjRO-0005OS-UO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:21:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id v145so145963555oie.0 for ; Fri, 06 May 2016 10:21:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=InN7sSyywqCw3n/rX2D5uNDb7DkFHocn1di3A2rwzVg=; b=ogUw5t3iFaZ0A9ApVqDh4AUSqnWYWXA7aTm5RKemzzNyFXcFzNfbfCn6XmMGgVqVtd ebqd+O6taTC4YxO9jMRwUmmEupAe8nnyPoosOb7/YheuB1NAfpSYAbsf2QOzQ0cZoEdk swUjiuIwczvZu74bYGBQugnqRPB5NBUt1r+/AKqvSyaETb0eiTbqM8Ar6dMvKoNBhKL7 G6FbNeeIdiMocYI5tY0JNthGA8uz19n5aGljM3373kYKIVb+r08+8BUqiKwmpMohbdrq ZHM1RhCR1Yno7ZY78fsA7kwRXBGxdFysfKruJ26l3WJBtuJ/m2Ss7VRTmEpEjOH8cIJj xeLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=InN7sSyywqCw3n/rX2D5uNDb7DkFHocn1di3A2rwzVg=; b=Afn6WTx5rHyJ2DuM5fjhD2uUtffGkY8PzeESjJDfiqlKMeiCrcXAO45DBOmAa/lpF+ Ptyl5aCenSee2zKWwJezyNuFsKzyk9vLj6nrsn3SaliWkQTcpovo6n8kaATOPvpsCJfN dSTviqFZ30YoOYxSErOIycIzURIk9+R26HwyVKGJikUMu/Uqu0q/PqXP3IR56KT9WBYl zGMM3s0O3cNyP7+2Kh29VOZ4FIbMLxBD+BN8D4Y5piuiN+xbYmyr85/DzCkOJySHkWFf b4iWfXADvFsvnxYLzogtf19Yc5AS6UsfUknnSXHBVUmVYIsAtRq3NsndUnie5eEg35EY /g0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUCBiZf9JDCA1b419otzGpoij+UfukqTAI8U6IEKDD8uBhr+qgFG3ghSjFXQcN49RBAeK47ClEhx5OyOw== X-Received: by 10.157.9.137 with SMTP id q9mr10021545otd.101.1462555269302; Fri, 06 May 2016 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.202.235.82 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117921 Archived-At: When I re-evaluate (C-M-x) a function definition that has breakpoints, all of them are lost. This is particularly annoying when breakpoints are conditional, because now I not only have to recreate them manually, but also specify all the conditions again. Request: preserve existing breakpoints within definitions where possible. One idea suggested on the devel list is to assign a marker to each breakpoint and recreate it at the new marker position when re-evaluating, as long as marker is not deleted (related to bug#23468).