From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Pogonyshev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Edebug: avoid messages on 'f' command Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 19:09:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160505131010.GC1950@acm.fritz.box> <83vb2rfiys.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvo3fcxe.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462554642 3390 80.91.229.3 (6 May 2016 17:10:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 17:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 06 19:10:41 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjGr-0002MA-Sq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 19:10:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59372 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjGk-0003Gk-PV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:10:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjGQ-0002yo-2T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjGE-0001Ed-AZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:10:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]:36615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjGC-00014K-Ar; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:09:54 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x201so146057865oif.3; Fri, 06 May 2016 10:09:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=BQQDXoZRMswXRjpeoGUWdCki5ZNxEVCMWi+gLT/2J30=; b=AFqc2SyZeq/q3FqAzdIlBywRXd6N2JmwrlGZETwH1bT+5pk/E4UjEIBDIJaKoHbfOM 5d2QNwX4b4CrPsN1wBHmLbQV5heAi6I+jOb2mcTs/cGBfEdzySeDIupJT00MAs7+zl4y 01ZHNy9rV6KoAD0MewPy3a5Z3MKvNKXdlWmIz6jO4PYfpF3V3JBTTCyWiOGmX8SwRQYX PqkCDq7QpV8r7ETuI9GcbNL3foViDFuvUEY70+cNOTKFDAvt7480Pf+ub39Cn05KfXXJ jp3Ockeyz52xTEWkAnhxQ76FoTaiXa+AWDR9TFOVM2UrDAYBlnfn1uLj9JbZGlrazoKJ Oc9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=BQQDXoZRMswXRjpeoGUWdCki5ZNxEVCMWi+gLT/2J30=; b=AL2JpFwovnxF/vjBPhiU0OtpN6wW1hXO/TaULTSF1L8GnL4TT6BHZWb4wnuX0V0r8k SuMIKXL2Mwn9NyLI36cW+Kq0hsOfO1Wb7HDFdnrnREnyV+0mCciYz0iBCLWtm81fWQOG NF8osh0Ovvt1aYeiqCTor4YS2otDKxR5V4+B/91arUBINCHj6FlOm2VKRETxQxl3Gfpg 5+0F7nA954tEg03S+dewg40i0Ylfzs0StzHheQZXJOX3xvWU2dkSoKj1m3c0kwy/r77K HeTsvaEj9hrUVLd0Aa+1f9fy7ZS41eDqM20kkujHcXfaT5iqfyWBqKzNP7Cbk4mZLEUU kelw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVJ7M5Qlp03raWw5qr8GnApAapTJGUTk+H3kxpWin2fRBTK/hry62n6EYCOkszx2ilFeaODTzL4fs8PoQ== X-Received: by 10.157.9.137 with SMTP id q9mr9997150otd.101.1462554560676; Fri, 06 May 2016 10:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.202.235.82 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:09:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83mvo3fcxe.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203648 Archived-At: On 6 May 2016 at 17:01, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > What was the subject? (The bug-tracker search engine returns almost > 200 hits for "Pogonyshev", so it's hard to know which of those you > mean.) By now I can tell that the mail got nowhere. > Usually, when you file a bug report, you get a response mail from the > bug tracker with the details and the bug number, so I don't understand > why you are unsure whether the report arrived. I had no reply, but also no error from M-x report-emacs-bug. I didn't know if reply would just arrive 20 minutes later or never. > Anyway, I'd still urge you to file a feature request. What can you > possibly lose? I will. I just know now it's pointless to use M-x report-emacs-bug unless you use Emacs to handle your mail in general. Paul