From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Pogonyshev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Edebug: avoid messages on 'f' command Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 13:55:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20160505131010.GC1950@acm.fritz.box> <20160507065745.GA8759@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462622138 13149 80.91.229.3 (7 May 2016 11:55:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 11:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 07 13:55:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1az0pc-0006Jj-4w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 13:55:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33988 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1az0pa-0007ud-Ml for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 07:55:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1az0pX-0007r7-7f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 07:55:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1az0pW-0000hR-3O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 07:55:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]:33723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1az0pV-0000hK-Un for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 07:55:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id v145so165916175oie.0 for ; Sat, 07 May 2016 04:55:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=fTDYH9jwMoMocTQq4wvmbdVZvnnVwJfZP08yB+MeLmg=; b=ivGfPvzLJ34e8BGz0+o3m5UmLV9OhJa7MRxA9ENfnk54Z4BcElOSvLgMZVuyQnNGy0 5Bow3Y4OtlpD3Nd2Vpa9N87/QnajO2ciFmdKkvXyWg3lxAw7uhZqVc7QN5aZwkx/dzfE 07YnmTc0FSyHwGaZN4LYJGVlUF6eksOJ+t/iPiLBMu39NFPW1Ol+xK901KuWydKeoLmu tYIGYU7TL4pq+gyuibBi3KW3MxSJemc/70cDsklX7X3dMN1ZgfCyRLcAHfCAQ39XtplG 3nEMinNxvLaexF5/bRc8RqfMhZIoHe+/xVACIC6v3MUbZh5yu0Vvbb8CcMTIGM2aRgPt DcbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=fTDYH9jwMoMocTQq4wvmbdVZvnnVwJfZP08yB+MeLmg=; b=eTBY9nptTlCoxepPq1vIyOtZ/JmsMc5DiIqfWkWlEO6zazcn0PjklJ1dt4qTXZIK8+ SjQxHoDKSC3OBFDgpVeMy1TCxrhLQUaI12benfaa9dZEh5luK/m8a/WryIa5eziYPIwl Brrtj451B3iDgXg/y7dVOccJ0l7W994rsLEwQXQU0J2/D4ZL3CaEGEjOG8csqZfOFcCO M5OPgogvNj5sY6yxdYTGdaOfkfPyeO68aBGvmpOEDJg0DMD9+GJOsCB+L71K4+Lai2BY R5vN77LAgqFmjB+lDukKFWj0e9XXlnJHuDpIpTyz0hT0VmIwd4a04oWieGK4TpiwP5c3 20lA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVtubLO8V9q/IR5Dim0YvzQcMbZE/Wdv0yvNsYmZOqF5t7UrcqlsEUHpJoA5M7G3M224TZUxDoD9cnHJA== X-Received: by 10.157.5.74 with SMTP id 68mr12621490otw.174.1462622128830; Sat, 07 May 2016 04:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.202.235.82 with HTTP; Sat, 7 May 2016 04:55:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160507065745.GA8759@acm.fritz.box> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203664 Archived-At: On 7 May 2016 at 08:57, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > One thing's puzzling me - who would ever want that one second of "Break" > in the echo area? It's annoying, and it's scarcely useful information. > Maybe I should just have ripped out that bit of code entirely. I wouldn't mind. And judging by the quite poor usability of Edebug in general, I think others wouldn't care. Paul