From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Pogonyshev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Is byte-compiled code supposed to call `make-byte-code'? Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 22:58:43 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464123561 15148 80.91.229.3 (24 May 2016 20:59:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:59:21 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 24 22:59:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JQ5-0001PK-Q4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 22:59:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55342 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JQ5-0006rh-25 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:59:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JPa-0006rY-Bv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:58:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JPY-0002C4-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:58:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]:33553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JPY-0002C0-8S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:58:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id k23so47284312oih.0 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:58:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ANBhv4VFK3uq5vAVej8fHXXsh38R+6+68+CbVas75aU=; b=A2lDBUHyAxYcdgGBN0rapU3AdjzcKrSdVxu07FtoaTRzt0KyBE1I6ukcMwfcsK5F0J w7jV7Z+y3JBCEYCGGI4LgiGwh5rEBx5HHQF/LScMShpmlnPieUz5a0aXRkZi+pYO84N9 z+YzmneB0gPmnc4TnQvQmz95MbknYPVcF5CWmx5aumGA7xU1sWCIYbhpwfOZ/Azc6PmX rLPGj67tUFY7VNPNHXrioRGeFGkuHpnUzR8aUYNnuHGKjo7LwGOw7Vsbu/cQsuqyTh1M 5FdnGNeolboxNix1WZ44zb6P8tTuvSg4lRCBa2+7A6oqncU4+EdhncSQGYTuzHX3pr68 SmKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ANBhv4VFK3uq5vAVej8fHXXsh38R+6+68+CbVas75aU=; b=bhxkQJnfaXW9DNbTZBS2XpC3IdDoap30N6Y3hRpLSt9c1LLf7iWm0K+L1JszPRayWn faPfrOR/2q6lRb9LksVJIs56u/bJrNhdg42YanFmjU4iu2+wqIZkjH58zcz1C8BHA29M 9M+jtRTJniISS2zIKPk7bNx14aOajhaniHZwDRjXN6Y4vtmcY/KXf5yCehuReTslfniU OaLc5nhKfRHGiTiHucy5/f5bh0gI2S4lLU3gWsoCLeuwsi2LK/vGCPXnND9+YfiPl5eC pBgfUd6reb4dWYa4rYsMd5kMxoC2zezlfuKClb2wV65EtGy7/VbXQAbw1ARh7saBuLp2 8v/A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJzhWJDm6v1SJeE58B49DSRrEWg8jDe/N7RFbgEz1tEk93TWX9S4YjkPVjtbb9wY1FE1Mkj1quG7t7ZnA== X-Received: by 10.157.1.11 with SMTP id 11mr140210otu.17.1464123523143; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.202.71.150 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:58:43 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203985 Archived-At: Trying to disassemble a trivial function that invokes a closure: (defun xxx (fn) (mapcar (lambda (x) (1+ (funcall fn x))) '(1 2 3))) (disassemble 'xxx) gives: 0 constant mapcar 1 constant make-byte-code 2 constant 257 3 constant "\300=01!T\207" 4 constant vconcat 5 constant vector 6 stack-ref 6 8 call 1 9 constant [] 10 call 2 11 constant 3 12 constant "\n\n(fn X)" 13 call 5 14 constant (1 2 3) 15 call 2 16 return Is it supposed to build closure bytecode object every time? Shouldn't it be considered a constant? GNU Emacs 25.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.20.3) of 2016-05-2= 4 Paul