From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kelvin White Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] ERC: support for IRCv3.1 CAP Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:35:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474575269 16029 195.159.176.226 (22 Sep 2016 20:14:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Vibhav Pant Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 22 22:14:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bnANt-0002pN-Kc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:14:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60170 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnANs-0002oP-0i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:14:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn7vQ-0005f3-BH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:36:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn7vK-00014z-Di for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:36:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:37278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn7vK-00014i-8H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:36:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b130so161020496wmc.0 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:36:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=thwcne9ehsFvUA2wch1huiNz15zBBa6HnLdTbOUYrBc=; b=GzbgMEocXdP72bptA4e5MSppN7CpVzlHWxWhUjgyRXuDTsvgxRRNeOEyQeM5xYuIIq DFOjtWwKXmRNlOsW4n6WtzljHVazjt63bpks34J1wdk06PvqJZhJKi+Nm8XlXJAzl1rh 8SgGVZNnnzbcW0suNtpDz5zFWFNUXBJ5pvDdK4OtAb6Q8uJlLVKMtZHIOLS7LuNFobO8 zuSVloXGcN2+K9ywNsTAEtiitfUkRrBprWUwHSf8Z4l+PhpK5waNdJ5c/3ueq58dtunL TeSrCdDjZ3zimFQFdsBb585qd6UaCL0i61zutFwcVvFT9AT044uf2BFRqKZTOlbsmFqN 2GvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=thwcne9ehsFvUA2wch1huiNz15zBBa6HnLdTbOUYrBc=; b=F/gB4aw6bHBKKPlDq/K7hlR5XiB24KWdh5jeC491FkGjkt0Rga588lpf+dAiYLHNtn J9yreaRLXuJHq4ShourWsROIkjQRKLfFimpaWRHuD2wjeXztYBx5rTun69mIjCfoo/TQ K2FENExIW4Ctw7gQhtGKXQ6iQxI/dSkU06jUTJEL/2B9rjRmGf7zaVoRGgigdJ0IZJBw uocJae85v/RYO19VWyk3FUEe1kO6RZw1LlEtOu75+51lXwL6jBTB7c9zoa39qrsumV8f 33VA16bhNH0c8/iEmsei3bHLrYMR1ToPyTruAqVBMhNFKV4Zrc1jZT2n3aysftNYRbzO riDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwP3UZs4COOH+slvyderNXn/eAbVP/5M/I9JK+6+FJ6GEFSoDXH16T3DjDerNkyx+osRaT1yA6iVxyI43A== X-Received: by 10.195.17.226 with SMTP id gh2mr3398075wjd.15.1474565737339; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:35:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.194.113.5 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:35:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: w30U_3LCv-cWJlkrsbqmmndCQMk X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 74.125.82.54 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207711 Archived-At: On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Vibhav Pant wrote: > Now that Emacs 25.1 is out, could this be reviewed again? I'd like to > add support for more IRCv3 features (http://ircv3.net/irc/) for this > development cycle. Sure thing! This is actually on my list for next week. :) -- Good code is like a good joke - it needs no explanation. -- Russ Olsen