From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kelvin White Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] ERC: support for IRCv3.1 CAP Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:22:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466522545 17748 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2016 15:22:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Vibhav Pant Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 21 17:22:25 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bFNVM-0006s4-MS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:22:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52528 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFNVM-0006lK-2Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFNV7-0006Xn-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFNV5-0006Fw-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::243]:33064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFNV5-0006Fp-JL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:22:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id k2so2847152vkb.0 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:22:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=3ZIumyLT4KIeRtsHY9DUGULmByJ+BSJVi3/whttGB8E=; b=0GPlJ673Vx9fGPQZ2V2sbZ/N3FHpCrOM0G1XvV5LWnZ3MJK0IQSS2t9kHwJvSB5lwM +UJjRErqLtjew6qX0dDUn0Gp/o+u25p0Yzz1a50SQseEqxF41g5Lb8hqp0BzqarmoPBv CUmh1/9ss45ULLJuLPaauAk2a3dyDL0oKyj/DdIZ/5Qi+jewHaP+2CA5HPTM9f2EJ7el 7AFCVYve+Njw7ecsxnnUSNdQ7hsEoeG/q1oNynipcPTYG6nQaUDiq7z2Vu5AiuuXqka6 ogxOkVNu30fwWQWgN1iL4v8xixTQ/YLXPntnW91pnWB/lHGHWyz/74t7YkvqH0pARkt1 KjDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3ZIumyLT4KIeRtsHY9DUGULmByJ+BSJVi3/whttGB8E=; b=dnQhM7g3VL/LNHAqSmubdiGrUhHxNbvcY8iOi2yJWGTpi94o0SLFIIFau2JGUJuuOt wPpPFTKy7x2bqIAsK0Y71q+kR5gYrVMCTCcox+fqzQsCRugO+WkWAVjxvGD9U+F/+X+d y3n0xdXRQxFHkt+Q1ftqTCHJcKMQLX6dAjhpRZbKONi4B59CPUKPkvNpCU2LMYHj68tx Bej6B7dnhdZ4vhj7Wy7cIJNxs4/iEKbWPEan5+MBDKBlpkYSy6LhTWxIA22lKnRgjwwW 6qNu7FZUCMfo9CvqHY51F2D2Web01h2dYPrFS5XRKqcFmQkBbhaUpFwIAAFsK61oD/ar I0mA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI1oWxwgyaWwsiiAaNpOnjJ5glBvAmDkqtDLgxM/q6zUzkUjkI58GysV+7tANUkqFDwjc9CDLpkG7PC2Q== X-Received: by 10.31.13.70 with SMTP id 67mr9744076vkn.9.1466522522925; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.176.0.166 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:22:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: pR-zWjHGAnsxatQQrRoon-GY0ZU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::243 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204640 Archived-At: On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Vibhav Pant wrote: > > The IRCv3.1 specification adds the CAP command, allowing > client/servers to enable/disable certain capabilities. The following > patch adds the CAP command, and the response handler for CAP LS, LIST, > REQ, ACK, NAK and error 410 (ERR_INVALIDCAPCMD) messages. > I'm not sure that this is needed. Why does ERC need to implement CAP support?