On Wed, Sep 5, 2018, 6:34 PM Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:

> Kaushal Modi wrote:
>
> (63065 20560) corresponds to 2100-12-21 05:00:00 UTC, which is pretty far
> in the
> future, and it seems unlikely you'd want to set alarms for that timestamp.
>

Oh, thank you! I inadvertently played some "Back from the Future" while
hacking with a package test suite to fake the current-time.

Sorry for your wasted time. It was my mistake.. I redefined current-time.

> --

Kaushal Modi