From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27647: 26.0.50; Line numbers implemented natively disappear momentarily when frame out of focus Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 12:40:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83eftnitpj.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmorjba2.fsf@gnu.org> <83eftliuk5.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9sgb8ni.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c06a1207c257c055acc086e" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507207282 9874 195.159.176.226 (5 Oct 2017 12:41:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 12:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 27647@debbugs.gnu.org, jonaswestlund101@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii , Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 05 14:41:17 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e05Sj-0001Q5-92 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:41:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39671 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e05Sp-0004gE-4J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:41:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e05Sd-0004eJ-UG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e05SY-0006qK-5Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e05SY-0006q6-1u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e05SX-0006ia-LI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:41:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kaushal Modi Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 12:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27647 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27647-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27647.150720725225801 (code B ref 27647); Thu, 05 Oct 2017 12:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2017 12:40:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49864 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e05SO-0006i5-AX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:40:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:49129) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e05SN-0006hr-Fa for 27647@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:40:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f181.google.com with SMTP id d13so24314995qta.5 for <27647@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 05:40:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lR1Y45GOaIF1YgNUkmGKV4PUpTrijHAUhiH1jF2GiJY=; b=Fgf5Rp4U7reU8VMDF3NW0TuHp0e0h46vahSBQnFE+tPf42DomThC9r3fnfGzIg4Ah+ 6hKKsoEP0Pt8NH1tCfeYYRRNpboCfNwwgDCuGLo599vX5CVCRDjZvHWcYdo1k2waTwBn NCtXd/6ijZ2wVStX/6cVLoXURhaII9X81zP3wShIAo/OAaCgiUmiUShVAeFn902xTyB4 je6NxSOchy8ZONf5cUrhd0ilUkHSeoZPevOSYazIgqJPIyoIXOR4KTzcttsZ+BWRzjsr v3gMPs4/A/rUN3VyurNpH0GOEijFh69vYHWUJPA603pc09FdZ3PhueJyaH0nSFHSh0Ev AgPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lR1Y45GOaIF1YgNUkmGKV4PUpTrijHAUhiH1jF2GiJY=; b=P6NatP2I4446fhpRoI4cOAGm9IhvS1KgNbC0et3D+pzFTKLRRsrjRI/FtvORXW/tvH mf/eTypMipMn8JiyllbcpvM2zScnnvKlNQHoxqby1clxIr7GywXcxivrMk7PPlmyX7nZ SaHr5UDD8KTgxb52CXspIQHq4kcVLIHRqYR2z2uSW8zVemOIeQeKOlqvKeozj1w6SaqD LRXS9nFqm9kKWO1pgA/7hHucec+dUOejBOm3KZs9jKtR1BMKPX4mIWkn4Hr/d0L/mTXa yyu2cWbUF/nfZSwk75AxMhn5YeN8+ut9/ZwsK6OABPwWHaPTYMrg7izylXfKazUrlgSh Vf9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXbM9qzbCZnGNz8/C0sftbfYktEQCtbnE9UBzMYrbQwaZ8NxEqn b0fCWW421zf1f5ozkwFVa257+gybBAIhuLGfji0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDPw53j2ngb99JLLOFAsv71G7CwzXMabZxRFZrxwWAGnZhzDjF0NYNB+/kbvxCFIa7/drouP33vhzin8YgMRLg= X-Received: by 10.13.207.198 with SMTP id r189mr11665817ywd.287.1507207245733; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 05:40:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83o9sgb8ni.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137964 Archived-At: --94eb2c06a1207c257c055acc086e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:10 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I thought about that, but I'm afraid it could cause an infinite series > of unrelated hits, each time Kaushal switches between buffers. It may > make editing impractical. > > But if I'm mistaken, why not? > Hi Eli, Noam, As you know from my other thread, I am unable to use gdb. As I don't know enough C to hack it myself, can you provide pointers to where I can put print statements or something like that in the C code directly to help with this debug? Another thing, debbugs seems to have stopped emailing the bug authors! Emails sent to just this debbugs don't reach me, like this reply[1] or this[2]. Can you guys please CC me on further replies? @Jonas: Any luck creating a recipe for this? @Eli: This problem is consistent, though not consistent enough to yet create a recipe. But it does happen at least once a day. I am still sticking on to native line numbers and not giving up. Can this be please made a blocker for 26.1? [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27647#38 [2]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27647#39 -- Kaushal Modi --94eb2c06a1207c257c055acc086e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jul 19= , 2017 at 2:10 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gn= u.org> wrote:
I thought abou= t that, but I'm afraid it could cause an infinite series
of unrelated hits, each time Kaushal switches between buffers.=C2=A0 It may=
make editing impractical.

But if I'm mistaken, why not?

Hi El= i, Noam,

As you know from my other thread, I am un= able to use gdb. As I don't know enough C to hack it myself, can you pr= ovide pointers to where I can put print statements or something like that i= n the C code directly to help with this debug?

Ano= ther thing, debbugs seems to have stopped emailing the bug authors!

Emails sent to just this debbugs don't reach me, like= this reply[1] or this[2]. Can you guys please CC me on further replies?

@Jonas: Any luck creating a recipe for this?

@Eli: This problem is consistent, though not consistent e= nough to yet create a recipe. But it does happen at least once a day. I am = still sticking on to native line numbers and not giving up. Can this be ple= ase made a blocker for 26.1?


--

Kaushal Modi

--94eb2c06a1207c257c055acc086e--