From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing bugs from the blockers Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:30:18 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160509235343.17047.73943@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20160509235343.759D0220128@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d35b00d56b70532b79add X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463139055 5178 80.91.229.3 (13 May 2016 11:30:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:30:55 +0000 (UTC) To: Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Andrew Hyatt , Artur Malabarba , Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 13 13:30:54 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b1BIz-0007Bz-8A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 13:30:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33963 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1BIy-0004Db-Bu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 07:30:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1BId-000482-L5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 07:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1BIc-0004hO-BY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 07:30:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]:34018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1BIc-0004gV-6u; Fri, 13 May 2016 07:30:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id k142so165739214oib.1; Fri, 13 May 2016 04:30:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rl9wOywIPR3cKEMIhnpylsZkxaLaa43WsLf+BRZagFA=; b=l9h9Qu2FpLnz4wQ4dEJ+trXm8qRG+P9eQVgGGda0rqPr8/qTw/2zRbu9rIBlTo4DiC RI57/Cl0NHkK4wN5IzUZNCCxlnif5N3JvjKL7lgi8jQC44Zl6ib8/4vzlDUbvXTSCsg1 K/y/23svTTFcKwaO4wZJK0DtjGU/wtoG4OEm2MUiuczdyCUy6n4jErlYiqc/0lwRKFB7 kMaBnMCIZwbW7h8mgqT69/NawhuU+kHnEQub2BqaWp5jf0WtpUsWrHd+/qIq/hrCJDAE M308w0HzsMtwaYmFgXX0Bcp6uj2MJb9fVuUDpKa4TGaz5Z+g4I216eDc4JX87J2xYHxc C70Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=rl9wOywIPR3cKEMIhnpylsZkxaLaa43WsLf+BRZagFA=; b=PIqBk2oyMMo0iqyd6YkHP5DK01mjJ0PuiIm8LnzYmISgphWZPoV23nU7/mXQXED5DQ NgSZryQnUHJ37wEqI7j4z9PrlhDBlR5wb2m+m3RPVdF+OZ/d5Ci1XL8chdI1HlKgMB6k yaKGANbaT3EPezJhl2lgkNI6kWYS8zeTPqTCOEwSOu4Hkdm2L1W9/WzdJ4YxOPwufplp a2goV9JPoLZH3JijLVb2ETcRBLmuyTIcGLGv7iZoAcMROzzYN7RshCVvhXqtifDiWRc8 cuEM+goNAuGjBoTybBVpIc6589sFE7FgwIHvPqybrIBp0xS8X5VVO8trxpjkYXqEV40s CfgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVrLZhcyeIUnQAS00Dl7z0aiPh0GEJqyb+r13Z3Oj4ogQRz5gsqOuL5vsLjLlT9YajBpHKXQKTSD+83Nw== X-Received: by 10.202.88.86 with SMTP id m83mr8330291oib.52.1463139028516; Fri, 13 May 2016 04:30:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203822 Archived-At: --001a113d35b00d56b70532b79add Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, May 12, 2016, 5:35 PM Dmitry Gutov wrote: > 20420 is not very important, and likely wontfix. > 22107 - same. > About 22107, at this point it is a documentation bug. this-command-keys and this-single-command-keys are equivalent (more info towards the end of that bug thread). But the documentaion still says that this-single-command-keys does not return prefix argument unlike this-command-keys. In fact, none of them return the prefix arg. So the docstring needs to be fixed. > -- -- Kaushal Modi --001a113d35b00d56b70532b79add Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, May 12, 2016, 5:35 PM D= mitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>= ; wrote:
20420 is not very important, and likely wontfix.
22107 - same.

About 22107, at thi= s point it is a documentation bug. this-command-keys and this-single-comman= d-keys are equivalent (more info towards the end of that bug thread). But t= he documentaion still says that this-single-command-keys does not return pr= efix argument unlike this-command-keys. In fact, none of them return the pr= efix arg. So the docstring needs to be fixed.=C2=A0
--

--
Kaushal Modi

--001a113d35b00d56b70532b79add--