From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22107: this-command-keys no longer returns prefix argument Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:08:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83eg98bsmb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137be764b484605329195da X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462975827 27349 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2016 14:10:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22107@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 11 16:10:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Uq9-0000zX-Jq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 16:10:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52429 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Uq8-0002tO-HR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Uq0-0002k8-Bj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:10:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Upu-0002z7-Fm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Upu-0002yv-DB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Upu-0000wX-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kaushal Modi Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22107.14629757503565 (code B ref 22107); Wed, 11 May 2016 14:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2016 14:09:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47489 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Up4-0000vQ-3Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:33335) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Uoz-0000uu-My for 22107@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id v145so69066896oie.0 for <22107@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 07:09:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BdlQO/YIo42J0VT3UtyfUVzswcYMP2qGGd8g/NUKCVc=; b=OAWu3g0TGVjoLDP+g3C/H4HTIfCpmN8fGOVxvPOgC3TVQWQzPcTZTQdRef0EkcNg74 ExQ375nSobUBve+t5U/ewnXqmKdwnr0PRkpOfRJpAcEIc97SyDaHUaqYn2e/CC1Z7jk2 LjnAXps0Tc9m2RiYKwkyaOD1/yZu2zZz4vdJDz9A5ELlPeekjV3mkLlRwWvQ9mCz5TCy ksL1YIzCG206yGC1JsKY9L/4GH/POqw+v7SryXBU86mmGmOa94w7xVN+QyXOdkcCDkbW 2I9jpTnrBdHnMsWE+gHpWDbKJH8RNBFH7cd0TetSrb9d3KLqpPF7rIzhIouEzTnXrsvb qW/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BdlQO/YIo42J0VT3UtyfUVzswcYMP2qGGd8g/NUKCVc=; b=h+JhoTLFD3Y5/fCOSJD0lfqrA1OgvhZvBp/xO/hNqDwdaXOA/Gk/nFg3PMLm5uv4SX svnHbBuiULTkRr8HoWnjynCjunvSGWmLmmktA3X10mnVflAdCc1FU5TNH/7DyBOCiVVB MYKEleSGXQ/hCs5pp7VQGJ7FN2/pR9XbWVNCUVIKeAhGfV4j/tw60iXlRFXV3d+BPYe9 E1y8ByrTo7dBO1WsiiRm3w0iEsiCB/BjdSJM6x/NMU5/kJ2lL3dztLn58l0Co+I0YZMF bwqDeKBvYu/n6DfNOIiIuAI3rsH2kxC1TpETRf2mvnqYoqTPlZDsSOQKVPxZHUfxw5Pu T65A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVgvp0T2SEA3+abNBIX++WeDJJ25OPRH0PFtpUVNBR1+alaMmkYqOA3yyYQCBC7JDOLW8BveJa7MFe56w== X-Received: by 10.202.203.4 with SMTP id b4mr1812838oig.197.1462975739935; Wed, 11 May 2016 07:08:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83eg98bsmb.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118126 Archived-At: --001a1137be764b484605329195da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:02 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Because that commit was reverted, see commit 0b7d6b0. > > AFAIR, Stefan thought that the current behavior is the correct one. > Found it ( http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/src/keyboard.c?h=emacs-25&id=0b7d6b026eb2cd69a90a9af41a4fca24389c5e47 ), thanks. I don't have a strong opinion for/against this change. But the documentation is out of sync and that needs to be fixed, right? C-h f documentation for this-single-command-keys. As it stands right now, is it safe to say that this-command-keys and this-single-command-keys give the same output except that the former's output is in string format and the latter's output is in vector format? If so, it would be useful to reflect that info in the docstrings for those two functions. -- -- Kaushal Modi --001a1137be764b484605329195da Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, May 11= , 2016 at 10:02 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@g= nu.org> wrote:
Because that = commit was reverted, see commit 0b7d6b0.

AFAIR, Stefan thought that the current behavior is the correct one.


I don't have= a strong opinion for/against this change. But the documentation is out of = sync and that needs to be fixed, right? C-h f documentation for this-single= -command-keys.

As it stands right now, is it s= afe to say that this-command-keys and this-single-command-keys give the sam= e output except that the former's output is in string format and the la= tter's output is in vector format? If so, it would be useful to reflect= that info in the docstrings for those two functions.
--

--
Kaushal Modi

--001a1137be764b484605329195da--