Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
>>> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 19:05:21 +0200
>>>
>>> Would it be OK to aim for including 9.1 in 26.1?
>>
>> If you consider it to be stable enough, then yes.
>
> It is considered stable.
>
> Aside: what would be the "correct" or "best" procedure to update Org it in
> both the master branch and the emacs-26?  E.g. should I commit it to
> master and then cherry pick it into the emacs-26 branch?

I found the answer in another thread: commit to emacs-26, which is then
eventually merged with master.