From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22991: 25.0.92: C-u C-s does not display "Regexp I-search:" in the echo area Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:56:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83ziu4hh1r.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpp8hgdy.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8m44md6.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113cd1fa962f11052dd2e016 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457758699 31645 80.91.229.3 (12 Mar 2016 04:58:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 22991@debbugs.gnu.org To: Bruce Connor Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 12 05:58:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aebcv-0003tt-Nv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 05:58:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58972 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aebcv-0004oa-1c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aebcr-0004oN-AW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:58:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aebco-0006IU-3p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:58:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aebco-0006IQ-1G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aebcn-0002SD-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:58:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kaushal Modi Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22991.14577586269368 (code B ref 22991); Sat, 12 Mar 2016 04:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2016 04:57:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45611 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aebbt-0002R2-Ms for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:57:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:35328) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aebbr-0002QW-Id for 22991@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:57:03 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id c203so100329279oia.2 for <22991@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:57:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=ivlN1mmF0dScqTrVx9r10I/tMubj2sun+d5blkK6YvI=; b=HYcS/gFOXzUzoSx1+VBcBNX/q9VQ48PHfu0S5JlLOlYjP7c5VRlHBh02NlT43R3tZj MqGINyDdEjFGg1Gzjv2nAhdS9Tg7FQbm4xGXGsS4pK5e9O6XQ66vkcP++oQgWOR1egW3 dGtKJZsGAciQ7ATAnWLVB2Pp2xVflhmkCfCx5xrQKxJ9d5uYOt+bM2JeWnSXtW+WVEDO R/DnSDzUPPLxIMZiUoBOrCN6YO5M2jOzN05wpFHd0MZWJnRTh98lsW8wqXjWGSSL1yjl TDeLl5rV5He7UeQe2U3Y34pa4SqcheTXk1E04ti5XlUiQuUeULbs+9oAKscVWulwbSi7 BchQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ivlN1mmF0dScqTrVx9r10I/tMubj2sun+d5blkK6YvI=; b=GZ0rVE5M9fuAG/Ho2OSEuvd1/FGKfI3jkMruXHEF05+RoAL8IgKpaVvi45atsVScGw VQNV2GWXFbr3quvJWy/z/EVRY9IKRqvxEjAcZhEFGCVmb/1VFoFc4l/qWRekgjRhNh11 VLV8J7ZeL8xCCospMACtvdjZXyg2DwOryS/ww1b6wsgzPZ+JKICSrbqYaHUKLHM+oPR8 fZ52/vxEQHVSXOUvrny2uxW8jmW73JTDwQaKAoAA/TU9UQH8F3BYYqtPvGS3hAFPNU+C c5RwzDxi4LEPDqOFR9KDLNDyAbmTlsD0IrgwGeGWFiDPam2qUFbYgBXREYrY2ZsxMDow UZBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL0Msm5X0Y1mt6qcXp1oMkA4EgaG6spT79HPDMfx0Kn6XYApqA1SlEeK7C8Fyj4fRK41PC2oGazj5PEJA== X-Received: by 10.202.185.214 with SMTP id j205mr8080404oif.68.1457758617872; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:56:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.202.172.198 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:56:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.202.172.198 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:56:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:114805 Archived-At: --001a113cd1fa962f11052dd2e016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sorry, I just remembered that I was one of the people (or the only one?) who suggested not displaying "Char-fold" prefix. But considering the example that Michael gave, it makes sense to remove that condition from the cond form. I would actually like to see "Regexp I-search:" even if I have set that by default. The result will be a less complex cond statement (will get rid of that "oring of ands" case in my last patch) and clarity as to what's the current isearch mode. What do you guys think? Or should we bring this up on emacs-devel? -- Kaushal Modi --001a113cd1fa962f11052dd2e016 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

Sorry, I just remembered that I was one of the people (or the only one?) who suggested not displaying "Char-fold" prefix.

But considering the example that Michael gave, it makes sense to remove that condition from the cond form. I would actually like to see "Regexp I-search:" even if I have set that by default.

The result will be a less complex cond statement (will get rid of that "oring of ands" case in my last patch) and clarity as to what's the current isearch mode.

What do you guys think? Or should we bring this up on emacs-devel?

--
Kaushal Modi

--001a113cd1fa962f11052dd2e016--