From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Odd block highlighting [master build] Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1148166081da74053cf6b05d X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474406140 23588 195.159.176.226 (20 Sep 2016 21:15:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 21:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "wsnyder@wsnyder.org" , Noam Postavsky To: John Mastro , Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 23:15:36 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmSNo-0003Sk-CV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 23:15:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38139 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmSNm-0002v3-Ki for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:15:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmS7V-0006dU-Ug for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:58:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmS7V-0005cJ-49 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:58:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]:34555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmS7U-0005c7-VV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:58:25 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g192so21569317ywh.1 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:58:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CTtA6XJOxF/ViokbOne1dcHRmHuvEE7gys+PiruZcM0=; b=wc2m7otsy8iWj0Au68cvqnbuYggcHv3JZQJCbXzG3TQOB56ss8zn6d+tWQpoUAsK5V /vEfVGsYQTYv9gtC06aln0kFv6ofyJAL0idRIPBQ6POKTO58LjhzTXgHCgZ+REFq9naB ahVEMTsqtO8fc3W45v0vccdWTO/gFYMOTGMFy8S3OmzwJzgHuD/unNOVelzYokuKWnf1 lZKJ0GhK4tpAdHpPkvpr/bmYDuuv1TpVvJ2NGi0CqFwV0k1ZB463VhEFYOxFf8KZSWQ9 khp0yyC3bGrj6Yt7oPMNyMYq6V10vVuEgZjlzu39POcmSd06kCq/2liNHOnlDDMfSMAe Dhmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CTtA6XJOxF/ViokbOne1dcHRmHuvEE7gys+PiruZcM0=; b=ErNRNrniL1gYq9KjPEnX78//XiC+aa1BwPOI3ZMTvVUkPcrz9DNA4RZ+aYuEtzK3ii ubwtf79w8RT3kcrWAko27WBwnnwwB45L57UalBZC7jwcNZy+yRv2E03gZA3icE158dRj MMGoTzUwbaka+Cg8c4PomuWdHxWFoJfPWnas/RAZExBMxPKXd4YtMpKoEnACHj5s+K9g LZXYPDr9s0dr2yPoQ3F921F3A0iUWyxaoWWNiDsh5qkeu0BJOLjX1OtbICHxgeWxkIGH wljyyitEsEQVrWxr7hquPGA8aAucX+KVqbfef7OywkjLU0JjVfE+cRoBo8b/Az1ZPGIB 9YPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNF955eybv93aMzmHmxjPHF1UIr1wvuaoFpxuWIWnWRMrLm1R4EnxUQsejCcezpz70/Zar1uHvZ0AGk4g== X-Received: by 10.13.202.73 with SMTP id m70mr12061194ywd.11.1474405104461; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:58:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207644 Archived-At: --001a1148166081da74053cf6b05d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks. That's right. While I still haven't been able to replicate the block highlighting issue even since the first email in this thread, I believe this has always happened in verilog-mode only (also I am working in verilog-mode 90% of the time). What's surprising is that switching to fundamental mode does not disable that behavior. Not knowing much about overlays, here's a question to you and whoever is reading this: Should the overlays for a major mode be cleared when that mode is disabled? Or is that what generally is done and recommended? Kaushal On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:49 PM John Mastro wrote: > The overlays have a verilog-include-file property so they're most likely > coming from verilog-highlight-region (unless some other mode re-uses > that property). > > John > -- Kaushal Modi --001a1148166081da74053cf6b05d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks. That's right.

While I still= haven't been able to replicate the block highlighting issue even since= the first email in this thread, I believe this has always happened in veri= log-mode only (also I am working in verilog-mode 90% of the time).

W= hat's surprising is that switching to fundamental mode does not disable= that behavior. Not knowing much about overlays, here's a question to y= ou and whoever is reading this: Should the overlays for a major mode be cle= ared when that mode is disabled? Or is that what generally is done and reco= mmended?

Kaushal

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:49 PM John Mastro <john.b.mastro@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
The overlays have a verilog-include= -file property so they're most likely
coming from verilog-highlight-region (unless some other mode re-uses
that property).

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 John
--

Kaushal Modi

--001a1148166081da74053cf6b05d--