If this counts, I am also against these mass changes just because the original quote styles looked "ugly". I prefer the original quotes to the curly quotes. On Sep 6, 2015 1:40 PM, "raman" wrote: > There is indeed a strong argument for removing /undoing this mess and it > has been made multiple times. Saying it's there already and it's not a > problem equates to declaring a feta complis that doesn't feel right in > a project that affects and benefits so many; worse it feels like it is > just being laid aside to return another day and bite us all even harder > in the leg. > -- > >