From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Replies to debbugs not getting to bug author (Was: debbugs#28688) Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 10:44:10 +0000 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0826529858503c055ab64a57" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507113887 2183 195.159.176.226 (4 Oct 2017 10:44:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:44:47 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs developers , Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 04 12:44:43 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzhAL-0007rx-2K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 12:44:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34267 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzhAS-0003Av-3y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 06:44:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzhA7-000322-NM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 06:44:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzhA6-0000Py-My for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 06:44:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]:48802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzhA6-0000P9-HC; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 06:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id d13so17576445qta.5; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:44:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=w2jwsets+WBz5gwCyp/GvgpBHESpDakG9UVhh/I2MfA=; b=Dq8eU718n5PfzqyysppBg5iOdTGFyIeh7s67vIRXf9InDzeURwVCSCM9zSH8pUPVoa sqIrdp67HZwdXL9nQC97FfQyxwnKF42LspcQH/RM+LEJ0yN/HkKiv7gA8XQJxyWFo3qV brCM0rx0YO9cmcIQOuxXoTIub8qoZ4odLrrbLjtT+cpPe7WKSrxn5ia3UNG3EAzbMDu1 yA9C0EuqxyNr9E2gpyh/DWDGIKj+4xPqDP0vFQngp2GqAJ66ZO69DUagTJGzVyNL4vyD IGBQHGxmlRO6b3E4QW/TF58T1X5w/Z60myleHVPlZCji3AueglZxsSe5rwuz1VN61wOV d/+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=w2jwsets+WBz5gwCyp/GvgpBHESpDakG9UVhh/I2MfA=; b=Jp03wTlW7T0NI1fqc4yoYm+SMj96taQA1U5yykw7ejxU7GOvaw6APRjY4mE4MiCEaP 7ekLUBvZYVD/igoU6uSLwtwPPmSuVAXIS1Xq+d7ItxwF8ssbmXVP2IBsb+HRVVaNZvB4 lKQHxK7cDOEdPvyU2qUaP7vVF87HjeM3FWq4sUp4uZq6yDRrV8AcbhLBJ9AOtJukYceb Ztp4AnZrS2Rw18fx5tuGWHf2Y2v3O7FDh5JIHs9//5ZnLoK2CGMpujTUlDoI58MFmzvr smiv6WNSAnEf6mmi1TukBC7HVrLnCur3MuhZWuf3NOTauqlDp2CPyxxqM00D9FC4bAnI iZUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWT6X+/mPbQMn16EQk7iH5NZM78IRm9jKWgxZ4U0QxxZv3XWDw9 dxa9HlyryTEu0mYz9j8mZE8GVxMzc7mTyy1YUSw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBrbWHrLjJYwqPYJJFRHZsGEHCwaDdQgk+2lkzaHK67lN44YURj4uzdV69c1K4S2fT4IilQz8m/Ej2/+gC66NY= X-Received: by 10.37.190.137 with SMTP id i9mr3603419ybk.104.1507113861400; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:44:21 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219069 Archived-At: --089e0826529858503c055ab64a57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello all, I am trying to understand why a reply to a debbugs that I initiated didn't reach my email inbox. I could see that reply only on the debbugs list. On Wed, Oct 4, 2017, 4:13 AM Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > > () Kaushal Modi > () Tue, 03 Oct 2017 21:42:59 +0000 > > I just noticed your reply here[1], but I never > got that email in my inbox. > > Probably because i dropped all but the debbugs addr in the reply > and set headers Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To to point there as > well. Is that a problem? That seems to have caused the problem. I don't use Gnus, and I don't know how common that practice is. So I am opening this up to a bigger audience on emacs-devel where more folks can share how they reply to debbugs using Gnus. Is there a reason to drop all the CC emails? I know that if you do that on debbugs, only the original author will get the reply. The "CC'd" folks don't get auto-subscribed to that list. So it would be a disservice to the people dropped off the conversation. But I was surprised that even I, the author of that debbugs, didn't get that reply.. probably because of the "set headers Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To" piece? It's either that this problem happened the first time, or it's the first time of me catching it :) (Is there a more idiomatic approach?) > I use a regular email client and just do Reply All. I believe that's playing well with Gnus users too. (In contrast, in this reply, i include you explicitly in To.) > Yes, I got this reply in my inbox. Thanks. > -- Kaushal Modi --089e0826529858503c055ab64a57 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all,

I am trying to understand why a reply to a de= bbugs that I initiated didn't reach my email inbox. I could see that re= ply only on the debbugs list.=C2=A0

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017, 4:13 AM Thien-Thi Nguyen= <ttn@gnu.org> wrote:

() Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>
() Tue, 03 Oct 2017 21:42:59 +0000

=C2=A0 =C2=A0I just noticed your reply here[1], but I never
=C2=A0 =C2=A0got that email in my inbox.

Probably because i dropped all but the debbugs addr in the reply
and set headers Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To to point there as
well.=C2=A0 Is that a problem?

That seems to have caused the problem. I don't use Gnus, and I do= n't know how common that practice is.=C2=A0

So= I am opening this up to a bigger audience on emacs-devel where more folks = can share how they reply to debbugs using Gnus.=C2=A0

<= div>Is there a reason to drop all the CC emails? I know that if you do that= on debbugs, only the original author will get the reply. The "CC'= d" folks don't get auto-subscribed to that list. So it would be a = disservice to the people dropped off the conversation.=C2=A0

=
But I was surprised that even I, the author of that debbugs, did= n't get that reply.. probably because of the "set headers Mail-Fol= lowup-To and Reply-To" piece?

It's either= that this problem happened the first time, or it's the first time of m= e catching it :)

=C2=A0 (Is there a more idiomati= c approach?)

I use a = regular email client and just do Reply All. I believe that's playing we= ll with Gnus users too.=C2=A0

(In contrast, in this reply, i include you explicitly in To.)

Yes, I got this reply in my inbox.= =C2=A0


Thanks.=C2=A0
--

Kaushal = Modi

--089e0826529858503c055ab64a57--