From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs? Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:29:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83ziu7mkee.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a04a8e6f1a7052da466e7 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457559023 32750 80.91.229.3 (9 Mar 2016 21:30:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 21:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 22:30:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adlgQ-00009j-Ct for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:30:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44643 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlgP-0000Ho-KS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:30:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlgH-0000Fq-Kq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:30:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlgG-00069x-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:30:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]:35573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlgG-00069c-EW; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:30:08 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-x235.google.com with SMTP id fp4so60821993obb.2; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 13:30:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DTW2d/ltqhCpiHnrWvh6yV97/SwlwuIdvcwpjCzQ0e8=; b=JsUD7zlRPzd0SOEbXw845kPOwTpMAK2ZxMw8w0mFsAvuyT94p8A009UwVEq1xcV4YP O0fxwpcSbDVFiowYbUE6I67gutQZo+Zi5eCVk1dFk+3usYZxHssOUApo//muiGg13fPE Ocmc+NdZzK3gbijkXu9VDH/yBctZxPY9NwdXU6CGElk0Srd6J9osyL5QyipO0NspvRdg yYvkFxXmOedZCoviLVuwp9Cdt/nKqCtV73fZZbKij1JEnLDrcpIrrWNVPFQX6WKE9ChT KWpQBO1OIRniIgVg3/DCATo3A4gBPucK8KbfCGz0FBiAzCF9YhBRRJEaivVovyhb++8Y rz2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DTW2d/ltqhCpiHnrWvh6yV97/SwlwuIdvcwpjCzQ0e8=; b=lPPCl0JnCTiYGmJSv+6ucZ0eEOzW3kCAZFIYBJaPEuciuKL6Hu4uxLgT/mtjq2UI6z NaSNCpNm2+vj9wl/1DOYTDwUD122qbXj8QGAKxfhe7Kd5aPPCIKtLdQjHAgT2rqHjGhz O5uHEqdIDjq3tgUbOhFW9tHVp4ZiZFcOajXVvKrgDvspmM15UKDsporCzBGi7atlQ3pA CqNd0bsBd3sIKuuPJtGUpXnlxpZBwFVjO0YPvs0w4bl51aVq7FL+00KIgxPxX8kqjYBj naRPl0LCZAgr4g57JBAarLmuTBPoOCrihDbRixlBKeIRtlUUIGj4Zkz+KKzkf684mKa4 EZ8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLMdEXz7jbd4KoAsgVFyUMDrcwHOMowTJf61NEL6kF9ARWdAUT/dVvq3b1k8CUgzkV++fUW1z0WCoAReg== X-Received: by 10.60.60.3 with SMTP id d3mr275291oer.24.1457559007847; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 13:30:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.202.172.198 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:29:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83ziu7mkee.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201328 Archived-At: --089e013a04a8e6f1a7052da466e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Why not put your Exuberant ctags elsewhere, and use a shell alias to > invoke it? > That's definitely an option. But I was looking for a way to declutter my $PATH and $MANPATH of stuff I am never going to use. Also I prefer to not hard code aliases to binaries because my binary locations are dynamic (the $PATH is update based on the RHEL OS version and version of the software (master/stable/etc)). Would removing "ctags${EXEEXT}" from this line (using something like sed) prevent building of ctags and its manpage? INSTALLABLES = etags${EXEEXT} ctags${EXEEXT} emacsclient${EXEEXT} $(CLIENTW) \ ebrowse${EXEEXT} ( http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/lib-src/Makefile.in?id=711ca362e7f8ca7c4f664dc2fe60bc5fa4e4f4fe#n153 ) -- Kaushal Modi --089e013a04a8e6f1a7052da466e7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrot= e:
Why not put your Exuberant ctags elsewhere, and use a shell alias to
invoke it?

That's definitely an option. But= I was looking for a way to declutter my $PATH and $MANPATH of stuff I am n= ever going to use. Also I prefer to not hard code aliases to binaries becau= se my binary locations are dynamic (the $PATH is update based on the RHEL O= S version and version of the software (master/stable/etc)).

Would removing "= ctags${EXEEXT}" from this line (using something like sed) prevent buil= ding of ctags and its manpage?

INSTALLABLES =3D etags${EXEEXT} ctags${EXE=
EXT} emacsclient${EXEEXT} $(CLIENTW) \
               ebrowse${EXEEXT}

=
(=C2=A0http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/lib-src/Make= file.in?id=3D711ca362e7f8ca7c4f664dc2fe60bc5fa4e4f4fe#n153 )


--
K= aushal Modi
--089e013a04a8e6f1a7052da466e7--