From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Fabrice Popineau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Regarding performance issues with the Emacs 25.1 Windows-build Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:51:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1478680445.2214391.782069929.51F43E52@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83shr0fwsu.fsf@gnu.org> <83oa1ofu6u.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8d7f0uo.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83k2cae9gt.fsf@gnu.org> <87h97deo1h.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87vavqxdgh.fsf@russet.org.uk> <831syehw56.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpg6vw5c.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83y40mgccr.fsf@gnu.org> <1479206967.3955707.788215361.663DEC5B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1479210173.3966163.788279825.21F1DD58@webmail.messagingengine.com> <80b07e1bcdffb365d8d1105614e3f7ec.squirrel@cloud103.planethippo.com> <1479216647.3987323.788371497.0DE981F1@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83polwhiwb.fsf@gnu.org> <1479224367.4015225.788520785.1E6A0AE7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87r366h4zj.fsf@russet.org.uk> <1480443971.2319495.802762825.27B6DA15@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87shqa3qne.fsf@russet.org.uk> <1480494988.3770401.803449137.51C4EED2@webmail.messagingengine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b143c9efa000542842a5a X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480510374 20802 195.159.176.226 (30 Nov 2016 12:52:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Noam Postavsky , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers , Phillip Lord To: jostein@kjonigsen.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 13:52:45 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cC4NN-0003oq-Pt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:52:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43695 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC4NR-00067r-Ha for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:52:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40277) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC4MY-000667-Dq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:51:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC4MX-0002vm-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:51:50 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp2.supelec.fr ([160.228.120.31]:57105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC4MS-0002te-8Q; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:51:44 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.supelec.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9188017B; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:51:42 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp2.supelec.fr Original-Received: from smtp2.supelec.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.supelec.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tvnet3o445bx; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:51:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by smtp2.supelec.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED37680198; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:51:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id g23so268643996wme.1; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 04:51:41 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC020CxSiQ8v59eNVP8stGzDrlbp3yqYjFKg05RFFq7/9B5U+qnhz6fR7jm4z41cfOYVI2ZLzeGmU+Or9WQ== X-Received: by 10.28.189.196 with SMTP id n187mr30509818wmf.133.1480510301728; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 04:51:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.28.153.205 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 04:51:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1480494988.3770401.803449137.51C4EED2@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 160.228.120.31 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209790 Archived-At: --001a114b143c9efa000542842a5a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2016-11-30 9:36 GMT+01:00 Jostein Kj=C3=B8nigsen : > While I think comparing performance between Linux to Windows is a > reasonable to a certain extent, I don't think it should be done blindly. > The OP stated that there is a 3x slowdown in startup time. Either he is using the unoptimized binaries, or he has a slow antivirus or whatever I don't know. I don't think that emacs per se is slower under Windows than under GNU/Linux. (and I already discussed that with Eli). Fabrice --001a114b143c9efa000542842a5a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2016-11-30 9:36 GMT+01:00 Jostein Kj=C3=B8nigsen <= jostein@s= ecure.kjonigsen.net>:
While I think comparing performance between Linux to Windows is a= reasonable to a certain extent, I don't think it should be done blindl= y.

The OP stated that there= is a 3x slowdown in startup time.

Either he is us= ing the unoptimized binaries, or he has a slow antivirus or whatever I don&= #39;t know.
I don't think that emacs per se is slower under W= indows than under GNU/Linux.=C2=A0
(and I already discussed that = with Eli).

Fabrice

--001a114b143c9efa000542842a5a--