From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fabrice Popineau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16517: Emacs and display resolution change Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:17:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <831tzwcisf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160cdb472833a04f0cb4ea8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390655952 8932 80.91.229.3 (25 Jan 2014 13:19:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16517-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 25 14:19:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W738o-0006l1-9L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:19:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51160 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W738n-0006lF-Ry for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:19:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45559) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W738g-0006k7-7H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:19:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W738Y-0002AZ-Ca for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W738Y-0002AV-9A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W738X-0000Od-ML for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:19:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Fabrice Popineau Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16517 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16517-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D16517.13906558951448 (code D ref 16517); Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16517-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2014 13:18:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35198 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W737n-0000NI-Cn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:18:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]:57694) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W737k-0000N9-Oa for 16517-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:18:13 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id c13so1422625eek.31 for <16517-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 05:18:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=AY0ZPQZLORZChb+AJeVaJza9RH42M8zWtphEgw7OZiA=; b=jgEPJKm8fCTJPGtsWKCu4QUcTxNgpZ3ClxlavOwz7BW8pCebUo9vtGpw0qBjPWBFSh jLR2fpYQDeii4Vt87XEx0zqpd66dk0uWQ8SXtawnZm6UNap54luIJzaSOmTHwkg0Z2/X 2Bqj2CGqYro8WvpB07nz/9vnjNlJwcJU5Rmz0V2b90A/Ei/rk7INNOYvKbJB5VGcSw2y wXfQjvoWB3kDIojsmmoHkEbcOnAgiFWSv9SRA7a0g5FURGoTeQ5nb+CE7AeRiP2nKEFk GCgGLZprnQ8F4HOaxPIF3o0u7egaVY4Ed30nb3NHK6jCBABz11q6/dbo/1xw8VscJwNd OPhw== X-Received: by 10.14.148.138 with SMTP id v10mr17456362eej.37.1390655891996; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 05:18:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.14.8.196 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 05:17:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <831tzwcisf.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83986 Archived-At: --089e0160cdb472833a04f0cb4ea8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks. It seems harmless for those who don't need it and helps a lot the others (like me!). Fabrice 2014-01-25 Eli Zaretskii > > From: Fabrice Popineau > > Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:32:31 +0100 > > > > The current Emacs trunk does not seem to honour display resolution change > > under Windows. > > There is one case where it is annoying: when the frame is fullsized. > > I have a laptop. I run `emacs -Q' , then `M-x toggle-frame-fullscreen'. > > Next I connect an external display with a higher resolution. > > The frame displays undecorated, but with a size of the previous screen > > resolution. > > I need to call `M-x toggle-frame-fullscreen' twice to get back a > fullsized > > frame. > > > > I think that for handling at least this case, the following patch could > be > > applied: > > No comments, so I applied your patch. Thanks. > --089e0160cdb472833a04f0cb4ea8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks. It seems harmless for those who don't need it = and helps a lot the others (like me!).

Fabrice


2014-01-25 = Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> From: Fabrice Popineau <fabrice.popineau@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:32:31 +0100
>
> The current Emacs trunk does not seem to honour display resolution cha= nge
> under Windows.
> There is one case where it is annoying: when the frame is fullsized. > I have a laptop. I run `emacs -Q' , then `M-x toggle-frame-fullscr= een'.
> Next I connect an external display with a higher resolution.
> The frame displays undecorated, but with a size of the previous screen=
> resolution.
> I need to call `M-x toggle-frame-fullscreen' twice to get back a f= ullsized
> frame.
>
> I think that for handling at least this case, the following patch coul= d be
> applied:

No comments, so I applied your patch. =A0Thanks.

--089e0160cdb472833a04f0cb4ea8--