From: Barry OReilly <gundaetiapo@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 15045@debbugs.gnu.org, David Engster <deng@randomsample.de>,
Eric Ludlam <eric@siege-engine.com>
Subject: bug#15045: Point jumps inappropriately around time of Semantic lexing
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 23:54:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFM41H2uuGXQTXBH8E1Z17X3QvvcXxFwtbDK3N8YTxCWR5zL3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvbo1loum8.fsf-monnier+bug#15045@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 761 bytes --]
> The patch is a bit "ugly" (in the sense that it's a bit too ad-hoc)
Yes, I feel the same way. What seems more appropriate is if there was
something like process-output-p which would indicate to Semantic that
process output is ready to accept, and thus that Semantic needs to
unwind out of its save-excursion form before allowing
accept-process-output. Does the while-no-input you mentioned exit in
that circumstance?
> But the main problem I see is that you already have a few "trivial"
> patches installed, so this is summing up to something non-trivial
> which requires copyright paperwork.
That's already done and you granted me commit privs to Emacs and
ELPA. Let me know if you want me to forward the docs again confirming
the processing is complete.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 882 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-16 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-07 17:59 bug#15045: Point jumps inappropriately around time of Semantic lexing Barry OReilly
2013-08-07 18:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-07 18:42 ` David Engster
2013-08-07 19:31 ` Barry OReilly
2013-08-07 19:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-07 20:39 ` Barry OReilly
2013-08-08 2:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-08 17:07 ` Barry OReilly
2013-08-08 17:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-07 21:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-08 17:21 ` David Engster
2013-08-08 18:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-08 18:13 ` David Engster
2013-08-08 21:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-08 22:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 7:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 14:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 14:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 17:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 18:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-08 20:03 ` Barry OReilly
2013-08-08 20:30 ` David Engster
2013-08-08 21:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 5:36 ` David Engster
2013-08-09 7:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 11:50 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-08-09 13:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 14:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 14:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 18:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 18:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 18:41 ` David Engster
2013-08-09 20:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 21:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-10 9:42 ` David Engster
2013-08-09 21:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 16:10 ` David Engster
2013-08-09 18:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-10 9:54 ` David Engster
2013-08-10 10:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-10 18:06 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-14 19:32 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-14 19:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-15 13:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-15 14:12 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-15 16:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-15 17:08 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-15 18:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-15 19:19 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-16 2:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-16 14:57 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-16 17:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-16 18:32 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-17 15:03 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-17 18:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-17 20:01 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-18 0:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-18 14:03 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-25 19:15 ` Barry OReilly
2013-11-14 18:21 ` Barry OReilly
2013-11-16 4:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-11-16 4:54 ` Barry OReilly [this message]
2013-11-16 17:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-11-16 20:33 ` Barry OReilly
2013-11-16 21:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 18:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 9:12 ` martin rudalics
2013-08-09 16:27 ` David Engster
2013-08-09 17:10 ` martin rudalics
2013-08-09 18:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-08 21:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-08 21:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-08 22:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 7:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-08 21:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 3:26 ` Eric M. Ludlam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFM41H2uuGXQTXBH8E1Z17X3QvvcXxFwtbDK3N8YTxCWR5zL3g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gundaetiapo@gmail.com \
--cc=15045@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=deng@randomsample.de \
--cc=eric@siege-engine.com \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.