From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Compro Prasad Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug #29083: Is it OK to add a new function to the emacs-26 branch? Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 18:57:24 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20171101112144.GB5276@ACM> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1509542856 17135 195.159.176.226 (1 Nov 2017 13:27:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 01 14:27:28 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9t3H-0003ao-At for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 14:27:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55891 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9t3M-0001dK-Nb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 09:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9t3G-0001dC-PM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 09:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9t3G-0001Kn-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 09:27:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::243]:56667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9t3F-0001KF-RB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 09:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x243.google.com with SMTP id v9so4137187oif.13 for ; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 06:27:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0gFySYD4CWQYytmufJT23thicroO+YpsW19HA9xddNU=; b=HG/w1KDE1D4Xw011d75Xh48XJT3Tl6L1meMrRQ3KhppZQtVlZIZB5C9M3zLmjJOiLf QtVxH/bXkJQG+cnIjWXB7t3iEKpPDjlO6h+DpvlUbbHUYVmOKVpe9by7k0ruyfq20Hz/ 4KEyqqr/TEucEls3+viaWx7qn6JTQFezFhNo3283D1ssMwRlNS3awCQDQZr0YI5NLnz1 BxGDEvObrgfPqS2gh5v6BXLlm3SzRu+JWire/zpf2/NoQ+ztXtOJ5Gv7DAKw26mFmJra T5kGIqK53faC1iJaSm63NTWbJuw3fVIdBWznQxzJEoDfdgHf2dx7JjxQpYMJIcLj1rRp 1ykQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0gFySYD4CWQYytmufJT23thicroO+YpsW19HA9xddNU=; b=okjuQzL9EOfmqWc+7KuQD4qHimd1lspKYB+o6AlyB1eTNl0D9uxBLxAu/UP4lIVAl5 8EvPcYKMYh/5QGykj18RRdlX4yMYPbd23iwPT7v2gFI5Yzs56RGbtnUq4YmEOU9GetkM NJFOTXGDkNBSMVhbYaw9CqFuQ6SQuasLiAbMBnA6sPwurWiMAm5jqUgn6F3yP+KyM2FC jnNYKLN4ZFmvo6q2sUSziXMWPwNgcIadJRdjRXeRWcZei2pZ8/Vg8JZFSSJ6s1LnDROs Pc0W2CAd2vkOq8JyRJh6/0CQGhp3Ght0Y/E171hCtvoEEfpgAuBXNS8hEmCOpROHscDO 2XLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXKByHvUPu21UNHCNKLZhGpxymaJqvDIO9lrCXyrTh0oML+sAkJ aZxz1n/UuC14kZTN9Oldqp3+pOdXyJJIpbbRvGk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Rl3j1KVfqYpfaeI4IcP42MX1fvhBLGti5Its3VPS8VTUiUD1mve6hpHw8WTcKkJF3LNod2lyg1nkynUapVzQo= X-Received: by 10.157.51.23 with SMTP id f23mr2462031otc.283.1509542844866; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 06:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.8.182 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:27:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20171101112144.GB5276@ACM> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::243 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219842 Archived-At: Seems like a good feature to me. I also didn't get anything out of M-x c-defun-name . If it was supposed to interactive then it should have shown the function name in the minibuffer. But C-c C-m is same as C-c RET on my system runs M-x man . If this was implemented then I would have to choose a new key binding for M-x man . Apart from that nothing worries me.