Re: Patch for beginning-of-visual-line and end-of-visual-line

[Justin Burkett <justin@burkett.cc>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1036 bytes --]

> The return value is unspecified, and I don't think I see why we should
specify it.

No problem. Thanks again

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Justin Burkett <justin@burkett.cc>
> > Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:54:16 -0400
> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >
> >  So I think this behavior is correct, perhaps we should describe this
> >  special case in the doc string. This function must end up at the
> >  beginning of a visual line, and in your case there's only one such
> >  place. Note that (beginning-of-visual-line 1) and
> >  (beginning-of-visual-line) all end up in the same place in this case.
> >
> > That's fine with me. While we're at it, move-beginning-of-line has the
> same inconsistency in the docstring.
>
> I've fixed the doc strings of both these functions, thanks.
>
> > Also, it would be nice to specify what the return value of these
> functions is if the docstring will change.
>
> The return value is unspecified, and I don't think I see why we should
> specify it.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1738 bytes --]