From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2BJJHPBpml9DcAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:06:24 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id kG8VGPBpml/WIgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:06:24 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5EED94043B for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57110 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY20s-0007SS-ER for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 03:06:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY1wt-0005ag-Vs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 03:02:16 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::133]:38696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY1wq-000174-Vs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 03:02:15 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 141so1953441lfn.5 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 00:02:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=oUlBwmITnVM+D/0Pnua7e/vgk+i9oj+95d0q1jgH4Bs=; b=hIGBH3DCsr5PcpaVBUgvpCuVBI6MDW29/iWpBTPYF1LBd9FlWWRYXtPvmPeH5Qh+4E Mfh+jIzAN5c63F9Bxen+ol+XIP/ZDgN8WQN3kfsNno19xisMGIiybELgf5qbEL0xOfSk ZrtBVurUV+a5M3sRHs6VBsATa9MeSXXr1Hx9TI51kz6WANlI3IMYVfocjy4+14t6yBQE 5IBQmkjr1Miu4CWMTG5+wZWBQIWYgBrpMB7sMUrIbc8qIU3OVBQXdNMUdylsecrb2pLV P9HkMvLJ1XlG6BIthSzftEeYB2RrMzNZH6cqw97m7U/Gy/fdrZKefqOTJOv84iij+kGg gkfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=oUlBwmITnVM+D/0Pnua7e/vgk+i9oj+95d0q1jgH4Bs=; b=pwVkYStXotmhOitptedKnc1CC4jrEAogEcjEpuJx8bZRmWUXpCvMZoBTWg7aUUBH7D SDaN/IpnXkeR1uGvtFCOw+s0TimKvbEfd16EW3iMiSYBSkaqHDS9MgpzFsd2gvqbGu6B T1ekXV+SX9SaGWaY51jj9WbBxjA7d7XGf15N/3pSrntAjpZ7mLD6JpN5M9ktVu69/4rB ZOw8sdGwopsgHupSdSXS58vRdhZWO3lg9YlatAkffvhaPIwBJGta/1le4RDHmwwglmt9 bwaxb2hec1DPcQsJKIlxjYpWIOTDk/ei3AvHCGBKluFsL7gEDA8n/5CJ/8z3JRvzNTC1 nabQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KoZFCj+ncqu7Yqw0H3BhCL0mzIgTUDcn7hK/E+zjquI+4zDdp 30PcnkkeXz7hkolvu1+bmOHkqdXiChMCcHLCLQHWsZThasujvA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAFJTS9u4Sh2SxRQB3Lq/5sjNO4YR0g9hLzfWQF4cIwz54Z+dnqU5RexDKdH0D5VsAxGDWG6BCyV0jyQFlb6g= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5618:: with SMTP id v24mr971253lfd.138.1603954930073; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 00:02:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Gerardo Moro Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:01:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Archiving repeated tasks under corresponding date tree for each repeated item To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d7c46005b2c9db9c" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::133; envelope-from=gerardomoro37@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x133.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=hIGBH3DC; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: JUk23PGWVeVR --000000000000d7c46005b2c9db9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear all, I am resending this as I believe it's a useful concept to implement, especially by those who track their tasks and do weekly/monthly reviews. When I archive a repeated task (let's say, a learning project of 15 minutes every Wednesday day for 2 months), the task gets archived in a date tree all under the day it was closed (cancelled) as a whole. This means that all the LOGGED individual instances of repetition are archived on the day the project got completed. It would be great if each of these individual "task happenings" were archived under the date and time they were completed individually, and not just all as one block. This way I could get weekly reviews that take those into account. Not sure if I made myself understood! :)) Thanks! G --000000000000d7c46005b2c9db9c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear all,

I am resending this as I believe it&#= 39;s a useful concept=C2=A0to implement, especially by those who track=C2= =A0their tasks and do weekly/monthly reviews.

When I archive a=C2= =A0repeated=C2=A0task (let's say, a lea= rning project of 15 minutes
every Wednesday day for 2 months), the task = gets archived in a date tree
all under the day it was closed (cancelled)= as a whole. This means that all
the LOGGED individual instances of repe= tition are archived on the day the
project got completed. It would be gr= eat if each of these individual "task
happenings" were archive= d under the date and time they were completed
individually, and not just= all as one block. This way I could get weekly
reviews that take those i= nto account. Not sure if I made myself understood!
:))

Thanks!G
--000000000000d7c46005b2c9db9c--