Re: should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography?

["Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

I was wondering about this the other day too, and am not sure.

It can actually be a problem, and has been for me, if you're mixing
export processors; like biblatex, and CSL (which is best to use with
json currently).

So I definitely see a downside currently, and can't think of a problem
in changing this.

If someone else can, maybe it should be configurable?

Along these lines, it might be nice if we could choose which global
file(s) or extensions for which processor.

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:07 PM John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>
> The org-cite-list-bibliography-files function in oc.el returns a combination of file-local files and the bibfiles defined in org-cite-global-bibliography.
>
> It seems like that should not be the case, i.e. if you define BIBLIOGRAPHY keywords it means you do not want to use the ones in org-cite-global-bibliography. Is there a scenario where the union of those makes sense?
>
> John
>
> -----------------------------------
> Professor John Kitchin (he/him/his)
> Doherty Hall A207F
> Department of Chemical Engineering
> Carnegie Mellon University
> Pittsburgh, PA 15213
> 412-268-7803
> @johnkitchin
> http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
>