when deleting 9 lines below with d9j, vim works in terms of visual lines. so if you have, between those visual lines, a line that represents a collapsed org-mode buffer that has a thousand lines beneath it, it would kill those lines in the process. That's what I'd expect. I'm killing what I'm seeing. I know that it is a collapsed org-mode buffer bullet. I'm deleting 9 lines below of the current line. I want that org-mode buffer collapsed buffer to be killed to. If you want to delete the real lines, just expand the bullet. as I said, you can see that this is hugely powerful. On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Yuri Khan wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Filipe Silva > wrote: > > > > Vim implements relative line numbers in a way that the "relativity" > aspect > > is based on the visible lines of the buffer. > > > Why this is useful? because it gives vim/evil-mode users the power to > > rapidly move through the visible lines in the window. If I want to jump > to a > > line in the buffer that I'm interested in, I just have to take a peek at > the > > relative number and then I know what to do. I just: 9k, to jump 9 lines > > down. This is actually super powerful. > > What about deleting 9 lines? Does deletion work in terms of visual or > logical lines in vim? > > In Emacs, as far as I can tell, visual line movement only affects > movement, killing still works by logical lines. > > That may mean you’d need relative visual line numbers when you are > going to press a movement (//C-n/C-p) key, and relative > logical line numbers when you are going to press a kill-line key > ( or C-k). >