On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org>wrote:
>
> The MIME *approach* probably *is* portable; you didn't test it.
>
> The MIME *type* application/emacs-lisp is *non*-portable.  That's
> exactly what the "application" type is for.
>

What is the MIME approach to handling text that is perfectly fine to
display plainly, but can be optionally enhanced with for example syntax
highlighting?

Are MUAs supposed to have a list of all of them? Wouldn't it be better with
"Content-type: text/plain/elisp" or some such?

Naïvely,


-- René