From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jake Goulding Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30320: 26.0.91; Crash when using lsp-ui-doc-mode Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:31:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83po5oeil8.fsf@gnu.org> <83a7wrer8i.fsf@gnu.org> <5A757B30.9070402@gmx.at> <83y3ka9gmg.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv0pal74.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3k88ux5.fsf@gnu.org> <834lmv8j3u.fsf@gnu.org> <5A797560.9000602@gmx.at> <83mv0h2ltf.fsf@gnu.org> <5A7ECD34.6000604@gmx.at> <834lmp2gex.fsf@gnu.org> <5A7EF644.5030706@gmx.at> <8337283im3.fsf@gnu.org> <5A800E8A.8020807@gmx.at> <83o9kv1qi6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1518399043 28185 195.159.176.226 (12 Feb 2018 01:30:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 01:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 30320@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 12 02:30:38 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1el2we-0005Ke-Hh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 02:30:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51495 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1el2ye-0005EF-7R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:32:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45421) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1el2yU-0005Do-7j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:32:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1el2yQ-0001Kf-RZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:32:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1el2yQ-0001Jj-OI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1el2yQ-00073R-Bt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jake Goulding Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 01:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30320 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30320-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30320.151839907727063 (code B ref 30320); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 01:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30320) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2018 01:31:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38764 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1el2xg-00072Q-Qp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:31:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]:42887) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1el2xf-00072C-CH for 30320@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 20:31:15 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id u6so9993402oiv.9 for <30320@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 17:31:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zkFmogjUaMt2aoTIT6Nl8BUEwAwizko/DRP0gyFJJVs=; b=nIMe+tpG+tlauTANQxKkJ6Th3jSpLZRZhUPN/2KWwgcLR2VUKmOpjQzoEO9W7z2+XX DxwtZYszozuQBf+RLMhnsy9pX+UShpeg99y2bUR2+sDytpnlXgAXpR4nsVTNgeB0Ul55 Ukkik9Kg7gbX9OmgH3EudoQLxUlMVl/JMN7j9X+41rQdjDeCrbFqHVcSoQB/mjgapGkX GtPl4VdEne9JKfwkhzdiRbLpF2W1uoy+HPGh00uxZ6K2MwzAMIJr3QpqvBrxAsWqtoxc iiRWNVUpWBeVkRX2CoBff8UqAO5Dud3Yj4G+rcCfabptBAs+rKRMETjxm/+GSx8D+H2Y 0Y0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zkFmogjUaMt2aoTIT6Nl8BUEwAwizko/DRP0gyFJJVs=; b=o5AD6YiMP0txQJ+l9f1b1UsdOpcAKoMvOol8f1wp7puoqpWrK9jV8VoRAACqpfaXeW hSsIGNg21kc/8CbB+9Lb7019izkyjmOdjO4m12paHuLmVVRFSheR6+WVr9t0PE6aMxN0 OqpO+71EPqMQIQ/MqtuR+BWNYS1tRerwq4xDYjMZ2ut5jZR98msKK4K8pPdbCQXLD0is ifa/cm9ddye2J0Yq8ZGU87FLL4bJ8+kUZfXbXroPfuf9j5EkQWMCUqI5uTdWrVOWIDjr D5jUGUKbfcxy1hr40shrr0pmyb1+L4NapdQvt7koVynwGl/Leil/Yz/5QgAzt59CCmXu prwg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBPYjb9cC/7gibcYcea7HjJKbDnfQP02pfc/lyXnQOFWkUuxAlt AFGuOMCb0QFsYrh5WWcaZtZ2Vb/YfVgAKUjAAW8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227Q2pgQPsRIOaLMcbu4e4iZQafCwhTL29/9U8Uxtdg/MRKlWKghU5prq5FQnV99FlQPNov5t7+9my0V2w1jkWc= X-Received: by 10.202.62.86 with SMTP id l83mr7117368oia.39.1518399069492; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 17:31:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.157.60.238 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 17:31:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83o9kv1qi6.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:143182 Archived-At: > I just hoped Jake would be able to test this with the original Lisp that caused the problems. I did reply, for the original patch: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30320#80 I assumed that replying solely to the bug email was the correct procedure to avoid duplicate emails, but perhaps I should be CCing each person?