From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien ROUCARIES Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Files from gnulib Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:36:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87oc75t4tn.fsf@meyering.net> <201101252337.15312.roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> <83hbcwxr2l.fsf@gnu.org> <87sjwgorl4.fsf@meyering.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345721799 31791 80.91.229.3 (23 Aug 2012 11:36:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, bug-gnulib@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jim Meyering Original-X-From: bug-gnulib-bounces+gnu-bug-gnulib=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 23 13:36:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gnu-bug-gnulib@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T4ViE-00081w-1t for gnu-bug-gnulib@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:36:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38364 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Vi7-00068D-G0 for gnu-bug-gnulib@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:36:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Vhz-00065K-L9 for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:36:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Vhy-0000aP-Fe for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:36:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:46401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4Vhy-0000aJ-7s; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: by lbon3 with SMTP id n3so377907lbo.0 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:36:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=c+lGGlZvtlHRvyqHFWZQOUixos1hm1DqIM/jjb4WdJM=; b=xyjYv+a7fGsclZqQFXP0KAruCKjwPAp9BoNBDMtDfIsfZMetQTM6CsznFJQvGSX03E FFBlBeaLQobzXEeuT8eyi+t9rsxXCenPkRITNtlbWkX1aiI48HIzqrLuPIeInsJuZLux 2GwiJUsz/oCTYMtzXyeCfkIIkZdO4h/gZPwiHLNAHmXEz8WQHi+I532SlI28GFLoqeXa HZvgv5fSsFDj4d/sDr2Bhp9PCM4RWD/0RSVOxdL4+UQPkg5etEcYSoPObtu7JGrtX5MV N14qrTxEBbe0PsUSXW6kaFgr2Ax2YG34OJFu0j9zEEYFopdp/H25VL2Oom5r62rLHhC+ D+Mg== Original-Received: by 10.152.110.80 with SMTP id hy16mr1415774lab.8.1345721776686; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.112.96.149 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:36:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sjwgorl4.fsf@meyering.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.217.169 X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+gnu-bug-gnulib=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnulib-bounces+gnu-bug-gnulib=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs:31610 gmane.emacs.devel:152763 Archived-At: [sorry for retrieving this old thread] On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> From: Bastien ROUCARIES >>> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:37:08 +0100 >>> >>> (if and only if doslfn is buggy, and it does not seems according to >>> a quick search). >> >> Your search was too quick. > > Considering your wish to continue supporting emacs on DOS, > I would have thought you would jump at a possible solution like this. > If it works (and indications are that it does), then it defines > away the whole problem. Wouldn't you welcome the idea of a DOS > port with no risk of 8.3 collisions? > > What if the solution really is as easy as it appears? Here is a > recently-updated FAQ: > > http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/hs_freeware/what_lfn.htm.en > > Please give it an honest try before dismissing it Moreover doslfn is activelly maintened. The upsteam release a new version in february. (http://adoxa.3eeweb.com/doslfn/), so time to drop 8.3 limitation in emacs build ? Bastien