all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
To: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li>, 73853@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*?
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:10:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADwFkmnzsX+sf8zEbQGDm=NnkWyRK_WWX6CjA5MqNZpk-N33wA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ed3zndd6.fsf@bernoul.li>

Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li> writes:

> It is very disappointing that you have chosen to deprecate if-let and
> when-let in such a rushed manner.  The same was done and reverted in
> 2018, and many of the same actors are involved this time around.
> I am surprised that you would make the same unforced error again.
>
> Reading through this and past conversations it is clear that there is no
> consensus what the ultimate goal is.  But as far as I can tell, few, if
> any, are fully satisfied with the current (30.0.*) situation.  There
> also seems to be agreement that unfortunate mistakes were made in the
> past, which limits our options now.

The goal is:

- To not have two macros doing the same thing, i.e. the pairs
  `when-let`/`when-let*` and `if-let`/`if-let*`.
- To deprecate the single binding version of `when-let`.

> This could have been prevented if more people (including non-debbugs and
> non-emacs-devel regulars) were given a chance to think about the problem
> and time to articulate their concerns and proposals, before facts were
> created.  Or even if the people who did take part in past conversations
> had spend more time actually talking things through.

I can agree that the timeline might have been on the shorter end here.

That said, I wasn't aware of any large controversy surrounding this.
If I was, I might have suggested that we give this more time.

> The same could have been done every time the dissatisfying state of the
> foo-let forms was brought up again, but instead new facts were rushed at
> every turn.
>
> Without stopping this destructive pattern, you won't be able to fix this
> mess.

I don't know what this is in reference to, sorry.  I feel like I'm
missing some background.  Could you perhaps help fill me in?

I searched the archives, but failed to find anything relevant.

> My short-term proposal is this:

Hmm, the points you raise are interesting but procedural in character.
Besides your concern that people might be unhappy with the decision,
a point that is fully taken, perhaps it would help if we could focus
on technical points instead.

Your proposal seems to be that we should rethink the decision to mark
`when-let`/`if-let` as obsolete.  Is that correct?

If yes, perhaps you could explain this in more detail?  What problem do
you see with marking them as obsolete?

Do you have a suggestion for what we should do instead?





  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-30 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-17 16:27 bug#73853: 31.0.50; and-let* is useless Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-17 16:40 ` Drew Adams via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-18  2:11 ` Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-18 23:42   ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-19  3:50     ` Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-21  7:07     ` Augusto Stoffel
2024-10-21  8:57       ` Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-21 12:09         ` Sean Whitton
2024-10-19  3:38   ` Sean Whitton
2024-10-20 12:24     ` Stefan Kangas
2024-10-22 14:47       ` bug#73853: 31.0.50; Should and-let* become a synonym for when-let*? Sean Whitton
2024-10-22 15:24         ` Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-23 14:05           ` Stefan Kangas
2024-10-24  8:51             ` Sean Whitton
2024-10-25 12:09               ` Sean Whitton
2024-10-30  9:42                 ` Michael Albinus via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-26 19:25           ` Jim Porter
2024-10-27  7:08             ` Stefan Kangas
2024-10-27  9:16               ` Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-27 10:12                 ` Michael Albinus via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-27 11:24                   ` Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-27 11:32                     ` Sean Whitton
2024-10-27 11:44                     ` Michael Albinus via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-27 12:28                       ` Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-27 13:10                         ` Sean Whitton
2024-10-27 13:22                         ` Michael Albinus via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-28  9:39                           ` Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-27 14:41                 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-28 13:58                   ` Michael Heerdegen via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-28 14:32                     ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-27 20:00                 ` Drew Adams via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-28  2:15           ` Howard Melman
2024-10-28  3:19             ` Sean Whitton
2024-10-29 15:21 ` Jonas Bernoulli
2024-10-29 16:36   ` Drew Adams via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-10-30  0:49   ` Sean Whitton
2024-10-30 12:55   ` Corwin Brust
2024-10-30 23:10   ` Stefan Kangas [this message]
2024-11-01 14:09     ` Jonas Bernoulli via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-11-01 16:33       ` Stefan Kangas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADwFkmnzsX+sf8zEbQGDm=NnkWyRK_WWX6CjA5MqNZpk-N33wA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=stefankangas@gmail.com \
    --cc=73853@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=jonas@bernoul.li \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.