From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [nongnu] main 791bf67d0a: * elpa-packages (visual-fill-column): New package Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 12:59:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <164117996273.7430.4856914456706939523@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220103031922.F1787C0DA19@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87r19pytwo.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfu4oh73.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16721"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 03 18:59:57 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Rci-00049M-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 18:59:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46458 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Rch-0007dX-Pw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 12:59:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Rc0-0006qY-Nw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 12:59:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]:54257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Rbz-0001PY-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 12:59:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f44.google.com with SMTP id mj19so29360987pjb.3 for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 09:59:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=f/X16muWnNsTjhaenYXAO3D8rF6UfnkYGA+eR+gOetc=; b=m8i1ALiW5dX8FSV564kjDTLy4IozsShUWlI09EPkhO8KMRZVj2mbFFlpvQpDugIIs7 aXUmX0U6hV85ioorZCg7aLtrj14CPoobAwXdKiL1vT3kCi9ZAfF2z1UYZ1aoP76flMrm h7PrsbHwafiud+TUerVO+HNidqIwJkSYHH8Sj2ytXJp0D/oi8c5nHzetXSWwx6fFMWVf tG9DpDUn+K6+cB0xRf4DPateXRKix2vIgz4wqrxjyvitGoeZAkn8asNEx0ew7tv1/xc6 Jk9bm61+PnfOczuGx/rSDEZMS9+O4gEzFii4wX+PO0ey5juigr5BpsZEzH9LJn46TMBe Meog== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uPe6bozEQyR7j1OQ6BOcijQH8iKSsx39fTPYqW6wD7yCIRilp WI2ajS80FptCWcxdb2sfcAE4/mx67O2+uhXcYR4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+PVG0FWgpPkUSOr1kMTCyg+h7tzYeTFoE+4NWNvLClgUtp0E0r2Gs+nhSITPBiDiY3ATCpG2cvMy9qpvtHlA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d512:b0:149:3070:48ec with SMTP id b18-20020a170902d51200b00149307048ecmr45098977plg.66.1641232749812; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 09:59:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 12:59:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sfu4oh73.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.44; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-f44.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284079 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > From my understanding GNU ELPA is preferred, and especially with > packages like there where there are just a few significant contributors, > I think checking if the copyright assignments can be collected (or have > already been signed) is worth the effort. I agree, but the question is what to do now about the NonGNU ELPA package that was added. Should it be deleted from that archive, or are we fine with keeping it there until we are ready to add it to GNU ELPA?