From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:28 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87y2lkb6kb.fsf@gmail.com> <9A4FA038-CCFD-45DF-8B57-E348AFF951D9@gmail.com> <87sgbsb0eb.fsf@gmail.com> <87h7s6c31d.fsf@gmail.com> <87mu1xrjqw.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <48ed4897-356c-4669-a330-1fdb5d65402b@default> <83lfhhijbl.fsf@gnu.org> <871rj9uz12.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <87wo10tzga.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <87363o3ahp.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31849"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ghe@sdf.org, eliz@gnu.org, yuri.v.khan@gmail.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, tecosaur@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , =?UTF-8?B?R8O2a3R1xJ8gS2F5YWFscA==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 11 23:52:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGqxu-0008Bh-Av for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:52:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33580 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGqxt-0007pQ-CQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:52:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGqxA-0006wj-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:51:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::630]:45805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGqx9-00030p-AJ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:51:32 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id i26so15575475ejb.12; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wydnEiXmDidEt6HunmlDBuT0BbLCNEApTCAGCkehHZ0=; b=PTHWX/aZt8BL/bhJWIA9BGrxWO6KonGMCXdCPJWCEwmRXaiojoq/TVpPNoRE96I4CG msKZP8uOV6KWgov0vmk0Uuxv+Md8HvgZrrKPbW4uZMgaLcfLimiw6QiS2/tDjPKGW9vu nOepTwWpKYqegwXmWe3XAbSC+iPjU2pKugiMDGrgmV45DztzDllw2O0uAKxyBuMAuQQ4 5NVDEXm+uXpoL+LxPG+1qo04qvkyPFnWi2PXwsmPjOdYnQh/0NvwOLqomGyYx9InTZvz 5OXIjlbBtbBRlyenuzCYVvvBmytqhgbG3lSNGB/gZO8putfLvYYsjS8wAlZ5XSrl7QaL ttAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wydnEiXmDidEt6HunmlDBuT0BbLCNEApTCAGCkehHZ0=; b=uCiF4t64eYkeeQZQAx9ofGX+DRL2nsu68Z4Z9osemEvng7ybddjFc/T/exaBNlOuG6 Ao/R/tWQbw8mUSu15xTVdFVncwHl6LmkjERueglCv+fnWtmXlmeNaSGRkG/D0kcnz/Z2 Fzzu+ZbSe8gwqZqOIdW2UKLxBTGolAYE+7E8HuWXqDAIYnriFl14+R/BsjLErXocpqti IowNAmlLpMTLiN/jaLsu4ECnYIcmd70yMDIcAFJnvfmdg3UO/11mZFU8FsoF0uKPEZm1 PU8ceVT9QKHyLZF3nw8L0Jatp15v+wOKAor1U7lsxjRjyCZgC+rhOK5mbxmcwZm2yALj 83bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QYjEG4YazfVBed79DJCqBX4ieR+kRsmKIXnD1Ahiepuqw7f2p tAWE0pS1BWiIpEQYjweNAuBBXyhPEjY8hGVwmu4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAax2vimU+81qgJwVJqZbf4W5RmIzasLamg2obW7Ph9tZ+0hYS04D5g1sBLoVFtKgDKFoBbAv8KXjhPFFxWTU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6993:: with SMTP id i19mr3788702ejr.26.1599861089333; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87363o3ahp.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::630; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x630.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255247 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > For what it's worth, I do not think this is a good idea. Emacs > distributors should do whatever they think is best, and for emacs-devel > to chide them (even as gently as in these issues) for their decisions is > counter-productive at best. Good point. I never considered that it could be seen as chiding them. Maybe it was a mistake for me to insist on this idea.