From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58459: Getting a fresh emacs session with no customisation Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:14:33 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1M2WN8RSJh3rnvRYoGKu2FOYFosKFsYxRLesaZKzA6dmdXLvGsxZNON-D3zRMgv-FkPqF2qFTurWu3u2ruoKK1QSzHheoICPo2MIi7VR6lc=@proton.me> <0geQIvut8pm1-9SAaI008CzSdp1E-IUa3kruCxKwrH66Gg92tJgKScNSDWJwuueXmV78tcULC_N_c9LG5MADKiD3_AjkXcNQTMQ6soTqIlc=@proton.me> <3gN0Jqr94UeUj3xJtDV3zGvZVbUyjtQFAloYxrdvwN_ZHa3tEUYyFv8h3VcYYSk_gxgMaaBW94kAkaAUCgbd9QKZMkkYJBty-7XOadbzHHQ=@proton.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34557"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 58459@debbugs.gnu.org To: uzibalqa , Phil Sainty Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 13 03:15:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oimoj-0008mU-TK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:15:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oimoi-00062e-Or for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:15:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oimoQ-00062V-KC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oimoQ-0001fd-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oimoP-0007Ie-MC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:15:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 01:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58459 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 58459-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58459.166562368228017 (code B ref 58459); Thu, 13 Oct 2022 01:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58459) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2022 01:14:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oimo6-0007Ho-5H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:14:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oa1-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:38731) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oimo4-0007Ha-2H for 58459@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:14:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oa1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1322d768ba7so712678fac.5 for <58459@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:14:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YACmZrsXrnacw2U4SihYdF2eO769fUAZxaliabMqVJ4=; b=O9FpBBV7RgWyY8KJHeyu65epDVZTH9ZpgZKjEcSjRziunprJYQh8svmhofosamp3BU 2kaATkiV6E492Tuao5ECQudEs33F7UH6OI17zrwESaUDC4Lrw1g4L68TtX5vGYqHCBQm UbEzVrqWLze4f7EvwW1I0vcqzy5i7afniUO1ZTU7kp1B65R+rqOiynRvz4UmxAqO0l4q YOlVKahUh5RCYA0Y1Slv2Cc1a8s0ZGXst+OVIc9jWuSQQsBXz/Mk5lfne0hXC9413PbW auHNI/JS/lfYcyApDrVP2/gZqugu4wUlPSEd+O2nfJNaDASUW1FFoqtLgHJDOPz93t8k 56cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YACmZrsXrnacw2U4SihYdF2eO769fUAZxaliabMqVJ4=; b=RbHE7ttY+UXpq4R5+3y0hEOzGFYWJFcE62GPqW5JEBv5I7hqep8wgYwNayozSnTvO1 d6PUUSh6QqD2dCeMhlQxsAFlOWhIkdu7C6qUhAFR2EjJw5aLLBnYQVMSTmNuj68Lyfb8 zc0jLMmiOi8df/SLz0/xpEMPP2YHKgobCjje1dtG60JKx+gjcpH/Om3WOLLMvbtDSRjA Iyp4//hH2WOSMHV6qvm3jQLSGz9+SdfBfDl8iXOnnVOoHdMY5R5zwJNIkdlylvhSDWKo pWCDjTCqz1lwbtqpB3xuVbfzjux75RB7xZ3RHF1Md2D/h6XsmPDUsWaqyi8mW69JXL9/ 2jvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf02PukeqvQabQMDNLd/8zgujTZE5aez2OChT/1o6IdSl1vGBAhW SE+sIG2VUwauJkeWbpzLxo9q6Beo9uIVY/5fxbA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM62Wi1xK8rffTk3iPGZPoI0TfrESWfslmi0Vrr5k7mvlXD1Zat3zPN0+SymuiofoQdFeSw5Wqg7NU26xKh9TsI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:9126:b0:132:b724:e96c with SMTP id o38-20020a056870912600b00132b724e96cmr4105352oae.199.1665623674413; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:14:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <3gN0Jqr94UeUj3xJtDV3zGvZVbUyjtQFAloYxrdvwN_ZHa3tEUYyFv8h3VcYYSk_gxgMaaBW94kAkaAUCgbd9QKZMkkYJBty-7XOadbzHHQ=@proton.me> X-Hashcash: 1:20:221013:psainty@orcon.net.nz::mCU0zpqhj5GVFQxj:2xuP X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:245256 Archived-At: uzibalqa writes: >> > I am continually amazed how unreactive emacs maintainers can be to >> > users. Either shaming them, make them look stupid >> >> Wow? This discussion has been between you and Stefan Kangas, and at >> no point has Stefan been anything other than polite and informative! > > Early on in the discussion, the response was immediately "notabug > close thanks". But perhaps you are right and I am being excessive. > Nevertheless, I am yet to be convinced how this resource thing is > straightforward. Please do not take us closing bugs personally. We have thousands of open bugs, and we try to handle them based on objective criteria. >> > but then months or years later, it gets recognised they were right >> > all along. X resources are of course a rather esoteric feature these days, to most users. There's a reason they're not used all that often any more. But we will never stop supporting them, as this stuff has been that way for decades. > Looks that "internal-set-lisp-face-attribute-from-resource" is doing the work. > So if emacs does not not even find an emacs init file, why does it start launching > them. Again, I think Emacs behaves correctly here. It's good to hear that using `inhibit-x-resources' fixes your problem. > Something must be going on, perhaps in the distro or desktop environment that could be > using something outside the traditional X11 approach to loading Xresources. Or something > else. > > I am using one of the Official Gnu Distributions (Trisquel 9). These systems should work > well together with Gnu Programs. At least, it is always said things are planned to be this > way. Then you should investigate why this happens in your environment. If you find any bugs, you should report them to the appropriate people. If you find that it is indeed a bug in Trisquel, then it is not correct to report it here, as we can't do anything about it. But note that it is good form to make sure that there is a bug before reporting one. I would ask in some support forum first.