From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: python.el: improve sexp-based navigation or make it optional? Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 18:06:39 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="1056"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: immerrr again , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 20 03:07:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jbDCR-0000B6-B0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 03:07:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45066 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbDCQ-0000Wp-DZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 21:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbDBy-0008WA-3D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 21:06:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2e]:44475) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbDBx-0001Af-62 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 21:06:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com with SMTP id 67so82376ybn.11 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 18:06:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LOZn/zSm9H1K7wxpSDr9kECWt7V1fLL0SlFrXJNaKLY=; b=D0hzVxY12rwOtFkpFD5mud+q8um2fd+jdzELkZYXLfieMmmlctNlvtO2RyCS9ly1fv rlnc6BTGrbR/d2y59vMEAzjSLqrIHelhvU8a3YfJ/SEXbKbIKytCrxjEODoar6uygZXx r3feX6mY7OGeIeG7qCyO0O7xpbxYkvzWP21vvhgtiMbBM+NXOu7N10Df+EHEXu/bdkiH qLhnlLQQvwVzE2pLL49fLf6zVdLD5OXVF7cwlfjBZwClkeVydbWxuxFCuxtIWzm/tRfQ +lmJT4OyijNr0hDIPdWXwOjDlSVyEQ2HXzYZ7H1HzVo1jfzYqJ/xMf+ebTI910+KK1LT PNMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LOZn/zSm9H1K7wxpSDr9kECWt7V1fLL0SlFrXJNaKLY=; b=l8RlLyqK8rDkvOzGGUv2GvZMGLV77Z74tU8THw6EoXROZ5IwFYwNmHbdUOpylMCkIY 9jmq4MO2P+9GZdscc6kPyC3y3c0HI3XjGv7agfF25WVED6FOjRaElNBw65YuhpFAvNaQ BlHjAbmTpISjQPbFpAT31D+YvVMTeM/E4uIJrtvULM/JzziWCGybTg87774r/p5lpxuS Ype/XlOumrI0VpSVIwvd0mPQt/I/Ql5ZShnES3n7WWJ66BsLa6vK6jLsZhu2Ba+fl1IW v/8WXAiDht6RDKAj215Cw/OLiT+AnqUdNF/hspzFkyRj5p+ytxrqsf24ogQHQ1ZrfVOx tGsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+g/eOn9vWEFXPigqZhFbPlIA2cXYT3pn1t+Tm8Mh15fdPI/q7 a3Ze+7oD9QFSUvWQ67GAREmyZrV7VXAUoOEXuKE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+W7I/Du3GwFDaDgc5I7p60YcBmSmsbDQixIJyZf10lHJqlzHgO3p4jODAcX40CWLbqDV7d3EqSuOLGg89C4w= X-Received: by 2002:a25:9304:: with SMTP id f4mr3479471ybo.309.1589936799838; Tue, 19 May 2020 18:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 19 May 2020 18:06:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2e; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250997 Archived-At: immerrr again writes: > In absence of such mode, I wonder if it would be a welcome addition to > introduce a configuration parameter that at least disables the smart > navigation, making sexp skip one symbol or explicitly > parenthesized/bracketed expression at a time. > > What do you think? Andreas R=C3=B6hler filed this bug: Fwd: Re: python.el: improve sexp-based navigation or make it optional? https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D41361 It would be most welcome if you worked on it. Best regards, Stefan Kangas