From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 16:06:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <874jkerxgb.fsf@localhost> <875y4uozgl.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h6oejct1.fsf@localhost> <87wmxanjks.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pm31gg3x.fsf@localhost> <877cp9ne5i.fsf@yahoo.com> <2dece74f-fdd6-9438-b09c-40147719af06@gutov.dev> <87y1hon6hr.fsf@yahoo.com> <93dc23df-036b-381c-681a-7525b350fb3b@gutov.dev> <87ledon5re.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cyz0n1zn.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8136"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Dmitry Gutov , Ihor Radchenko , Philip Kaludercic , Danny Freeman , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 02 16:07:13 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qcRHM-0001wL-H3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 16:07:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcRGe-0001uX-MQ; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 10:06:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcRGd-0001uL-D8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 10:06:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcRGb-0002pR-9J; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 10:06:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5009969be25so56423e87.3; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 07:06:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693663583; x=1694268383; darn=gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zALHhjdq/4nOiLit31C9ewWo24BeJS9ONCJ5IgLfa5M=; b=kntftPadJiqKyJtBSo+ky6jM56kn15n08+NK57NxfQNCoMtiln5m6pJNfDoBrMjrK1 8OyOCZUAmaPLaN8nHGH42pef+OegIoXayWjehOEV3OB41pPCF1qQnX8lx9ufVhVaEwH6 mLmNNmpbKZ8aH+zxPEGzJSgRTTlTXNhgVy1/IAL04wu1/wQG0L1+WoBTZk+UCbFLeMUH stYgC8IA6lWOi4WYhcNJBXmFhZjOqERa/zVytmOcTLxSWpYFMZA1lD5Vkyng9U2uSPkO e4KlJzEIbQ+RvlacokMRp6P9ZQIef2NdUKUT9RRpzX43u9ahdtMZHPrHTKq9yAnrj6MU BRPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693663583; x=1694268383; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=zALHhjdq/4nOiLit31C9ewWo24BeJS9ONCJ5IgLfa5M=; b=bHj7X5dISc8X5gvIqNoYkFfuNx4z/iOKETvmYDS36SWk3cRMz7KywpHTE/O04LLH5n giyoMns3qiohXGMno7zaI9hMiSthtBOw6SoUfMPEtbLuqmlWfdbpaaehkUNUkQQUD6bw sz45roGo6UnZILxiL+ZoasOUN2+5inq2VBJ3zibehsTPDTsVKYRz9hlOybw+HzB10GED ZUr6h6e0B6NswgIbKBHTgPHZx2NsNfww/0yLen4lN5KWT1rJzhUwKRO3jhv/4OF6oTw9 1TWKJwEMsPsgnC9s0TRabYHuah+DilHLDdr2OIClIq0QXExvqVnkjfh2WS4RihR+TqoJ 83fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyl7iloMwOlYJ/Y/ZyhCEzEcaPYlmRZct5l5QvblEnwlngq6nz6 DZsFprtKK4CF35xufgpIrFF1cmhtzabrDpUyAao= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGys+2zwrozszpTTbiTyxPyTWkMW1oesnXr+BdQAJAvpX/LRECb1CnC3Y9UV7/eY9nayBfKXq9sbzoLmvwRfew= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3f0c:b0:500:b102:d1c6 with SMTP id y12-20020a0565123f0c00b00500b102d1c6mr4068071lfa.47.1693663582981; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 07:06:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87cyz0n1zn.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::130; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x130.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309890 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > The point I was attempting to articulate is that hesitation is not > tantamount to refusal; if a bona fide large number of Emacs users are > blighted by this problem, one of them should have steeled himself and > reflected that fact to us by now. Ideally, yes, of course. The problem is that it doesn't happen as often as we hope. There is also a survivor bias to take into account when people do write here. My conclusion is that, if we want to form an accurate picture of the sentiments in the wider Emacs community, we have no choice but to pay attention to what people are saying in other forums too.