From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs.pdmp not always rebuilt Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 16:03:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87h7dyqo02.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0iu8e2u.fsf@gnu.org> <87czomqmn6.fsf@gnus.org> <878rzaqilg.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmsl7cc9.fsf@gnu.org> <6c69780538e7dcf21be8@heytings.org> <83fsth6jjr.fsf@gnu.org> <6c697805381c56ec6eda@heytings.org> <8335pg7w8p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6522"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Gregory Heytings , Emacs developers , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 04 16:13:37 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXOim-0001Sr-4D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 16:13:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXOil-0007hS-4G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:13:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXOZC-0002TY-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:03:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:42847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mXOZ0-0003Xd-G1; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f179.google.com with SMTP id l6so11162929plh.9; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 07:03:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NoU+MiGoHjZ8ENxZTToTlsu6J42CXWN1KBVJIAUaneA=; b=BKnh5eiOn9MFZHF4gWXV8GM7If5s5Ev+g7c8HYDv0uXpYUT8FyU/vaz6INfAGGujNn Lgo2Nj3yp7OTwEtYL6u2Y9Fo+lx1ZTfagRhOyNGYIzcjFDjqHrs8iAKn4IlVpYGgSWNn q0fBpWXoZo+lYPT3vQ/pUeBoIvqaX4Xv/NrMeeYJPjI+xpGeh3ekWIeZ6SLtVova26nU Nd4QHaRnsb708Q+f/C2jcnTdosfxJcr1zg/OTkpiAF5oB2Sw9XSuSZ4Gb5SysCelXqQF xAcAx6lkvyuZqNU+lAX4TxE3on7YwZa+m+Tey14e7X5rH247U/JPq6W7mZaDROyCPZSm Qtgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532L8tG9pNZPC0l4ogW4Y5b08ntGyCVZX94L6e+X71gdVLXfGEuh gUUtxMSDycnnBLo06qsKP3eGY0Ixj//Z+D0nKf72v3OE X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPioK4kcKu75atZ/n/ub1qsZZFDuSHcrWaLql2v2hGvlObFNpn6wrg+nqyX0xhW8vBV3ltfX3l5wY6X9i1Au0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3805:: with SMTP id mq5mr37150351pjb.143.1633356208368; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 07:03:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8335pg7w8p.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.179; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-f179.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276195 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think avoiding the call if the function is not available > is the cleanest solution, one that we use elsewhere in Emacs in > similar cases. That sounds reasonable, yes.