From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12864: 24.3.50; bad & confusing Customize `State' Menu behavior Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:20:52 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10730"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Mauro Aranda , 12864@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 01 18:21:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kD921-0002iV-ER for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 18:21:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35972 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kD920-0007nJ-DW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kD91q-0007dY-ES for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45406) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kD91q-0006tW-52 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kD91p-0001zR-Ts for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 16:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12864 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 12864-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12864.15989772607620 (code B ref 12864); Tue, 01 Sep 2020 16:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12864) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2020 16:21:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56952 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kD91o-0001yq-3V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:21:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com ([209.85.208.54]:40319) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kD91n-0001yb-6a for 12864@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:20:59 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id l21so2036127eds.7 for <12864@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 09:20:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wkgAEP+MoVWKhTRqTlyEEiQbFX9i8jKqIbrrckfFpko=; b=tkwYFvvOUtW4ZbeFFGfYDjtJVgKP9IcDKmX3TfVARkQm2v1XUMTO/clYDHH+iCt0u4 SRaYaD5OE5coCoHhcDmUt+ePloScndAqW5iDjlToGZGxBizQhjICafxm5MCewP8beg0f qo1XSOGmfpuvrJnkObHQLDGjadtMcZU871qYlzTn8BI35K5jmvDm6THOxAGPUmk5Nn63 0DGNOtMkCjt/EnP7rFF7CbbO/xKY+MAhcDfeWTAwoprMJns5Ek3AeDNPu4WvzMF7qhBb SBIysMhHkqPJm/41raedtVDdEV1/MHcSEkClzjxIVRc40LNmRDmBSpTL6zAuopMoT7dO W2AQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=wkgAEP+MoVWKhTRqTlyEEiQbFX9i8jKqIbrrckfFpko=; b=sA8M0pTAav/8Qq39JMY/0lKHKbPV5789Q0NejJb8TfBnmL57YX5s0HkjHm8AqBn174 DZtlAttnEKRMBqjkgaXdyaGRxCcEWQdT1VT++tZk3id2TASHM01Xza47t7gat7tKSQN7 5epsGZ7qx72pqG7JqoVupT5kHwnvUHDUed6dw2pfLXOHQWSQBlZSPs6IM1WxdXaGA8Ta qUBYa/uNgJlThiWaI+jYnhAuLnRlsFA4b6E2K/2vYgikls+fhlqPVJGYpDGi2shpo1Ju 1uYQ9yQgwXmtQEnhJZ3vW8i0lQtpRrmbmPrJh1pMqKtOhak7cXoEnTARUXB2Abvw/GDE 4LwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KdTpQbmSljaeujhjF1m0FZqW9lFUtK4lATa+Z2opvyrjC7qPt w9+DyOHyoKeOb97wiogpyjefXOhltGGBjtaS5DQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAu/MY6v5MniWqcqHXBGx3KDP43LYe3D+gr+aP91Za4Uy3CEhGr8kSsE2tALJGox9Rux/oZOH+QdbaEb6ieQo= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c0d5:: with SMTP id j21mr2536512edp.259.1598977253428; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 09:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:20:52 -0700 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186866 Archived-At: Mauro Aranda writes: > I'm not sure how to proceed here: should I send different patches for > the bugs, or put the fixes altogether in one patch? Some other projects emphasize smaller and logically self-contained patches. Here, the preference definitely seems to be towards making bigger patches rather than many small ones. But I'm not aware of any strict policy in this regard; it seems to be mostly at your own discretion. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but my take is this: It's really up to what you feel makes more sense: if they are closely related, you might prefer sending them in one patch; otherwise, it might be better to send the changes in separate patches. (My personal preference is to avoid bundling unrelated changes. But I don't always work like that in Emacs.)